Message from @Pelth
Discord ID: 631613013853732873
Clearly have forgotten 1990s
the final result was a compromise between the federalists and republicans
and euro history on 1848
i never said that retard
the peaceful transition from the totally federalist dominated government to the totally republican dominated government was pretty unique though
it happens all the time nowadays, the united states kinda set the standard
So you basically had 2 revolutions
No, we had one military revolution
the election of 1800 could be argued that it was kinda like a democratic revolution
Yea
I’d say they both fit the definition
Okay, I could agree that fits in a peaceful revolution; not the first american revolution
The stances of the federalists and republicans was vastly different in many ways
eventually the republicans adopted some federalist stances and vice versa though
Like the republicans had a hard on for france and the federalists had a hard on for the british
*Bipartisan politics*
that's one reason why they declared war on britain later
in the war of 1812
the republicans were in power
one of many reasons
The casus belli was the impressment of american sailors into the british navy
there were lots of causes for them to declare war
that was one
it was estimated that over 10k american sailors had been impressed
because they had been fighting france for like over 20 years
and were low on manpower
Casus belli = war justification
there were also native americans with british weapons
ofc, there were indian raids sponsored by the british and such
and lots of conflicts
paranoia about the british arming the natives was also a big part of it
How does this relate to syria?
talking about how revolutions usually fail
or end up in a bad way
i mean
especially when you support terrorist organizations
we only really have reason to believe that those chemical attacks were literally staged by the rebel groups themselves
they are quite literally terrorists afterall and none of this is beyond them
Its more about middle eastern stability