dude it's your duty

you're literally born to do this

I think you are delusional @TobaccoMike

idk, he's right

@Vlad He's impeached, but he isn't out of office

shoot some liberals for me

you gotta do your duty

True, @Solicitor. Guy over here is saying he's not been impeached.

Nobody's saying he's out of office.

Well, there are people confused on both sides about Impeachment

You can be impeached and still be in office

Which is the case, yes.

The House impeaches

and the Senate convicts

Explain it to this guy.

@Unity.Nat

The process of impeachment should be brought into the senate if it's the case

thats how it works. The senate has never convicted a president out of office

not if you stop it first @Unity.Nat

not if you become the hero

Instead the Dems arn't giving the senate anything

become the hero they deserve

and need

Of course. Mitch said he'll coordinate his stance with Trump.

@TobaccoMike If you're worried about Trump being removed, he isnt. In fact, if the president is impeached and not convicted by the Senate his term can be nullified, and he can run for 2 extra terms!

Until he recuses himself, nothing should be given.

@Solicitor i'm not worried about anything

either way i get my laughs

Good

You're right

<:kermit:591248635220721674>

Lol

<:cheers:591247651022962689>

when does the first voting take place?

for the dem nominee

I think Feb

Biden will probably win

Hearsay:

If two people say something, and there is no evidence in between, it is functionally the same as hearsay.

All evidence can be forged given enough time. Who is more likely to be able to forge evidence?

If juries take in everything they hear at trial, then aren't they speculating on each piece of information? If the actual can do this, so can the potential due to equal protection [Part of person is the stage their in] making it so witnesses can speculate.

Hearsay + No evidence = No trial.

Then add in intent [example]:

Her brain thinking it wasn't so hot but her body thought knew it was hot. Direct intent vs indirect intent [Which is sometimes also direct intent when brain thought is aligned with body thought.]. Body thought is what people perceive your actions meant, while brain though in actually what they meant. If the two don't align, it is functionally the same as an accident on the person's fault side, not the people knowing. To the people knowing it is intentional since brain thought and body thought aligns.

Sorry about length :/

Are you saying the Democrats are waiting so they can forge evdience?

evidence

Never know, just means it would be more probable