I just want you to think through all of this

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Bitch Who Cares

If you disagree, you can go through each claim.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)I Disagree

Have you ever researched ANY of these lies yourself?

Yes

They’re all here

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

You can look at every single one of them

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Link please

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

This is why it’s important to be able to think critically, and is one of the reasons that people with college degrees are more liberal

@Yusa do you think the President should be able to ignore Congressional Subpoenas?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/16/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/

Just a sec

@Yusa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Subpoenas

@Yusa do you think the President should be able to ignore Congressional Subpoenas?

In some cases yes

I have something important to do irl, be right back.

-warn @PennywiseTheGarbageClown spam

⚠ Warned `weirdos#7674`

Under what legal authority should the President be able to do that?

Give me a sec and I’ll respond to everyone

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1212769512774422528

not to mention blatantly ignore the law as in the case of the Impoundment Control Act

The president's oath requires him to uphold the constitution, there are more parts than congress ability to issue subpoenas. More parts override fewer parts, which in some cases is good, some bad

Upholding the Constitution means respecting the powers of Congress

There are MORE parts

That is the problem though

Define a part

The executive workers have to abide by the same rules of the presidency as well

Like Article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7, then amendments 1 2 3 4 5 6 etc.

The President also has to abide by the Constitution, which gives COngress subpoena power

But there are more parts as i said

More overrides fewer

Since when

It a sad truth

it's not sad nor a truth

Want me to prove it?