this is like Adam Sandler level shit

Not just handwave and say “it’s in the footnotes”

Harder to do with limits on posts here

And you haven’t responded to Lawfare

Which disproves all of your points

No, it doesn't

@HeadlessCowboy then write out your points like a big boy

Yes it does

I beat all of that history stuff

You have to listen to all of it

It’s not history

It’s jurisprudence

I beat it, i already know

Speaking of JFK, did you ever read that exchange about JFK and what we now call MMT?

No, you have to listen to all of it

it made the rounds a few months ago, i thought it was cute

You haven’t listened to all of it

You won’t understand until you listen to all of it

Sophia, you still don't get it - read my google drive, and i'll listen and laugh at the podcast

I read it all

Prove it

can you link to somebody besides you saying anything similar

It’s all refuted by the podcast

you don't have any footnotes, etc

Prove it

Prove it how

How are my basic counters beaten?

Way way way back before alex jones went totally crazy, i met people like this who were serious, even if they were nutty

They’re all beaten by lawfare

You have to listen to it

Talk to me when you’ve listened to all of it

No, you explain since you think they are right

I used to call his show and argue with him and other callers

No, you have to listen to all of it

It can’t be written down here

I can’t respond to individual points here

What about all intents and purposes?

The work stands by itself only holistically

Just listen to lawfare

Nah, it is wrong spew