You are finally getting it Sophia, it took you a day

If you are just “both sidesing” investors.com and the associated press, then I rest my case

@HeadlessCowboy why would that be the case?

guys

Read the last message

What theory of jurisprudence would allow for that?

.txt

Yeah, @Sh0t, she was great in it.

No honey, you need to answer with your typing like a big boy

They waived

I’m not reading your treatise again

And kept forever

Ralph Fiennes rocked, too.

Who waived what?

Strangely underrated actor imo.

Congress, President, and USA Supreme court

@Deleted User The article cites reliable sources

@Yusa then cite those sources individually

I’m not paying attention to an opinion piece on a right wing blog, use real sources

@HeadlessCowboy ok, that’s any law though

It's not an opinion piece

He'd say the same for left wing

What piece are we talking about, @Yusa?

So what you’re saying is that all legislation replaces older legislation

That is correct

But debunks your own theory

Yes, anything after the 14th/preamble passing can be voiding by the people at anytime legally

i foudn the paper

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Do-Non-Citizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf

that's the one cited in the IBD article

No, anything precedes previous law

Is the only thing you’ve proved

Lol

Not if the before was to last forever

Judicial watch calls itself a conservative foundation on its own website

It does

@HeadlessCowboy that’s not what your previous statements have claimed

Not sure if it is truely

It has

It is a three clause statement

You said that the law locking it in is passed by Congress and the president