Message from @Ishkode
Discord ID: 571156634613710858
Whereas nature does not have any such intention.
It is only by our social's morals
And if our intentions are to kill,
That we choose who we get to kill
It isn't manslaughter,
It's murder, which isn't a mistake,
Or it's war.
Is abortion a mistake then?
That depends.
Did you intend to have an abortion?
Is doctor-assisted suicide a mistake?
If yes, then no. If no, then yes.
Is the death penalty a mistake?
That's the real question
The most neutral decision you can do
Again.
is to throw away these morals
It's based on intention.
Become based
If you intend to do something,
It's a mistake.
No one intends on executing people by the State ofc
Except in many cases they do.
"rarely"
Saudi Arabia intends to kill people for various crimes,
So they do.
in the modern world the death penalty exist
but has rarely been practiced
last time my State did it was like in 2013
and we killed like 13 people over 40 years
anyway offtopic
I don't think my state has the death penalty.
Not sure though.
the philosophy of neutrality is a lack of moral
HOWEVER
if you're seeking neutral as in balance
then pragmatic is a better term to use
The way I view it, when making a decision I act as an atheist simply because when you let your religion influence that, it can cloud the results.
For example, if there was a vote on state religion,
You let your lack of religion influence that as well