TM

additionally he raised a terrible daughter

Why's she terrible?

aggravated cheater i suppose

@Auspexel one dude sums it up best in that thread. Listen to him on psychology(maybe), but ignore him on philosophy

or at least when he is pontificating about anything related to post modernism there is also his weird situation with religion, which is why some less shallow christian groups don't like him/trust him

When he was cornered about what he really believes, what he described certainly wasn't christianity, but he was having a hard time admitting it, but it was bad enough for those groups to write him off

this is why he gets the label charlatan and such

then there was that whole thing with jewish IQ, which got my twitter banned because i was in the debate directly replying/receiving replies from him, people like vox day(whom i am not a fan of) where involved in that if you know those people

vox is also one of the christians that went after JP for the christian stuff

His psychology lectures are very intriguing, and debate wise, he's very very very articulate and I understand and like is language

I think he has a very hard time working around concepts he doesn't understand

yea i gave him a fair shot when he was a nobody, then i started seeing his name again during that c-17 thing

like his stance on climate change

it reveals that he hasn't done his homework

c16? whatever that canadian bill was

c-16

Completely agree with him on that one

taking liberty to give to someone feeling offended is wrong by proxy

if you see my other posts on here, i am pretty anti tranny, but I think he misrepresented what that bill was doing

You might be punished before realising what's going on

that situation has evolved quite a bit since, but I like what the canadian bar said about it

they wrote a formal statement on his claims about what the laws is/was

@Pelth that's wildly ad hominem, and doesn't slant me one bit

Oh did they? I'd like to see that

would help in clarity

stfu druggie

and before that, it is intuitively good for me to be able to have freedom of speech and not have any coercive imposition

@Pelth ❤️

or, put more simply, to not have the impossible happen

which is to have trans people control systematic liberty of reaction

You can be a trans, but you ultimately have no control over what people call you, and that constitutes no reason to admonish them

@Pelth eh, not cool

How can you be trans?

Truely

The trans cult is a problem, but I think it was a different problem than what that bill was talking about

https://www.cba.org/News-Media/News/2017/May/CBA-position-on-Bill-C-16

what's what hte cba wrote , you can find more about why she or whomever that person is wrote it, i think that's a female name

"Nothing in the section compels the use or avoidance of particular words in public as long as they are not
used in their most Dzextreme manifestationsdz with the intention of promoting the Dzlevel of abhorrence,
delegitimization and rejectiondz13 that produces feelings of hatred against identifiable groups. "

GG @Auspexel, you just advanced to level 2!

so if I accidentally call a trans a female because he looks like a girl, if it wasn't done in mean spirit, but rather by convenience (inexorable), nothing wrong with it