@Togger property dualism

-df property dualism

**dualism**: (1) The theory that blood cells have two origins, from the lymphatic system and from the bone [marrow].

(2) The view in psychology that the mind and body function separately, without interchange.

(3) The belief in the existence of two entities (as one good and one evil); [ditheism]; [bitheism]
*(1) The [scientific theory] of dualism helps explains a lot, biochemically.

(2) The [hypothesis] of dualism provides a good insight, psychologically.
(3) I believe in dualism, for two opposite forces, one male and evil and the other good and female, or vice versa, makes a lot of sense and helps explain the [neutrality] of our universe.*
*(<http://dualism.urbanup.com/6936891>)* *9 more results*

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/#ProDua

This that slipknot song

2.2

@Vagtarian check that link.

So then do you concede on the basis of realizing that we both conjecture different realities?

@!GoldenKingship! What?

Stop making everything about "conceding", @!GoldenKingship!. It's even more annoying than your broken grammar.

Reality cannot be different, unless you believe in modal realism but possible worlds are causally isolated so this makes no sense.

Yes its a deep realization to come to but i think you and me both know that where God exists so does exist no God.

Thats gonna be a long read for now

Therefore we live in a shared universe.

Information is overwhelming lol

We live in a public world*.

Correct philosophical language.

This comes from Wittgenstein's private language.

Do you not think that humans existing with different physical characteristics have a shared destiny?

I believe we came from apes

P1) Language can only be meaningful if we live in a shared, public world
P2) Language is meaningful
C) Therefore, we live in a shared, public world

Then apes ate shrooms,dmt and other drug substance that improves their mind

the joe rogan model

Ty hha

@!GoldenKingship! So can you provide an argument for God or no.

Ah yes so you agree that because we live in a shared "Public World" that perhaps divinity also is connected?

No.

Wittgenstein was against transcedental causes.

If i provide you an argument you would simply justify that it is not viable simply on the basis that you are a dualist so how so am i able to convince you if your believe so firmly on that position.

This is because he thought that language is used to describe state of affairs in the actual world, it does not describe anything beyond the world's state of affairs.

GG @Throttles, you just advanced to level 8!

@Throttles, how did Aquinas' five ways go again?

@!GoldenKingship! Uh no...? You can provide an argument which doesn't have to do anything with dualism.

@Vlad I only remember his first way and the fifth way, first is argument from motion and fifth way is telelogical argument. The others are irrelevant, first way is used by Edward Feser since it's the most prominent out of all the five ways.

How can you fully distance yourself from God and prove theism false?

@!GoldenKingship! Failure of arguments for theism and various PoE arguments and Divine Hiddeness.

So the notion that there is no proof for God's existence becomes prevalent in an ungodly society.

There has been Societys based on God though it contradicts your point for God not existing

@!GoldenKingship! Appeal to authority. This is not philosophical anymore either.

"Murder was popular and okay back then therefore it is moral"

So do you believe that our universe is full of disorder?