Message from @Vlad
Discord ID: 648929854292623360
FOR
RETARDS
Whoopsy
Religious people are so bad. You get a retard like Trump in office and then they have to assume he was "chosen" by God to lead them...
Cuckservatives pretty much feel like they HAVE to defend Trump, otherwise they are going against the will of God, I guess? Lmao
there isn't much thats worse than a religious conservative
joe
Yo
religion and philosophy chat 🙀
Ikr
religion time
Yay
Look at this bullshit cultural marxists tried to spread about Dr Peterson
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2018/12/new-study-finds-jordan-peterson-fans-are-mentally-ill/
```Andrew Canard is a Professor at the Theological Institute of Theology (TIT) and studies the Peterson phenomenon. “Peterson fanboys are one half Lost Boys from Peter Pan and one half Dunning-Kruger Effect,” he mused. “What’s sad is Peterson restates life hacks found in men’s fitness magazines, wraps them up in mythical mumbo-jumbo, and Tyler Durden wannabes lick it up.”
```
I agree with the first part of the statement though.
It's not a bad thing that he manages to motivate young men to get their lives together, but almost every single Peterson fan I've ever encountered is either now hyper arrogant, acting as if they found the sole truth about live and everything in the universe, or simply brush off any criticism against the man.
He's the single paragon of everlasting truth.
Of course, the rest is bs.
what is the Dunning Kruger effect?
I am incredibly surprised that you don't know.
Inclined to believe that you're asking on purpose, too.
Caught in the act, pal.
Well, people do often think they're smarter than they actually are.
But it definitely is more accentuated with people who've been elated to new heights by Dr. Pete.
At least in my experience.
Lower their competence; Raise their confidence.
Check mate.
Peterson is a druggie with nothing valuable to say. Those with any sense can easily see through his charade. He attracts the weak, absolutist types of people.
So, I assume you've read "Maps of Meaning" and "12 rules for life", Pelthie?
Can you walk me through them?
His life is a failure.
As is yours
Prove it.
Except you can't, because you haven't read either.
I've read them both. I would say he is a charlatan comfortably. I would not call him a failure
It's the domain in particular. If you agree with his psychological basis(Jungian, etc), then his work there is good. For me it's on the philosophy and his pontifications against 'cultural marxists', 'post modernists' and the like
he clearly has NOT read the post modernists he often brings up