Message from @Cobra Commander
Discord ID: 679508309501280325
You need *evidence*, not assertions.
Autism mode is about to be engaged
Geuss he gave up
יהרה not real lol
I like how he ignored that I had already said that it's not, and will probably never, be 100% understood how life originated on Earth.
smh
וםו
ךםך
@Cobra Commander First off, an assertion: The vast amount of intelligence around us points to a creator. I mean, do you really think all of this complexity was made by random chance?
Now, proof: The probability of the chance formation of a hypothetical functional ‘simple’ cell, given all the ingredients, is acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 10e+57800. That's 10 with over 57,800 zeros behind it.
Yes i do believe things can happen on their
Own
So you don't have proof
Dude, did you see the next part?
And you probably don't understand how that's not proof.
Use a non Christian source
I linked you
I'll link you again: https://creation.com/cheating-with-chance
A source like that is biased
All sources are biased
Your sources are biased on evolution
No not proper scientific evidence and research
My sources are biased on creation
@Cobra Commander Don't discredit a source because it's biased, because then you wouldn't be able to count any source as credible
Biased is a bad thing you know that right?
That article is literally nothing but a long argument from incredulity
That isnt evidence for god's existence
No, go find a source that has *actual* evidence of God's existance or *actual* proof debunking evolution and doesn't essentially say "this has low probability of occurring so lets take something with zero proof at all as fact instead."
Low probability =/= impossible.
@Cobra Commander They got the information from mathematicians and scientists. Sure, they are creation scientists, but your scientists are evolutionary scientists. Both use their world view as a starting point. You can't discredit someone just because they are creationist just like I can't discredit someone because they are evolutionist.
Got it
Just a sec
"creation science" is not science
Yeah
Read this.
@Cobra Commander if you want to meet God and have him prove his existence to you, it's fairly trivial.
Not a single scientist is cited in your first source also
Only if you care tho.
It explains what I want to explain better then I can explain it.