Message from @Cobra Commander
Discord ID: 679504594736250882
Just realized i made a typo
Typing is hard
> You've debunked nothing, you can only make assertions with literally zero proof.
That's how I feel about everything you've said.
> you can believe what you want, just be honest that it's a belief at least. Don't act like you know something is 100% true
Same goes for you. You are believing in life coming from non-life. You can't repeat it and you can't guarantee me that it's true. Although you are apparently 100% sure that it is. I've given proof and methods that suit me and you have given proof and methods that suit you. Tomorrow I will have some extra proof to make a triple-logic punch. Full of links that are NOT from wikipedia or Answers in Genesis. I mean dude, just admit that life coming from non-life is a belief and not an indisputable fact.
No its fact you twat
The experiment he gave did not prove that life could come from non-life
Despite the fact that I have said that I didn't claim that the origin of life is 100% determined and that I referenced evidence for that?
He just proved that chemicals could change
Exactly
Into life
Life is chemicals
@Cobra Commander Yep. It's not even past the theory stage. It's just that, a theory. And a very unscientific one
Just think about that until tomorrow
gradual process: inorganic molecules > amino acids/organic molecules > RNA/Protenoids
A theory is a hypothesis with enough evidence to be considered fact by definition...
jesus christ *learn* about the things you try to argue against before you debate
Alright, well then both life coming from non-life and a God creating the universe could be considered theory
Equal theories
What evidence supports God creating the universe?
I'm glad you asked
Thats not the bible
oh lawd
Autism mode is about to be engaged
Geuss he gave up
יהרה not real lol
I like how he ignored that I had already said that it's not, and will probably never, be 100% understood how life originated on Earth.
smh
וםו
ךםך
@Cobra Commander First off, an assertion: The vast amount of intelligence around us points to a creator. I mean, do you really think all of this complexity was made by random chance?
Now, proof: The probability of the chance formation of a hypothetical functional ‘simple’ cell, given all the ingredients, is acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 10e+57800. That's 10 with over 57,800 zeros behind it.
Yes i do believe things can happen on their
Own
So you don't have proof
Dude, did you see the next part?
And you probably don't understand how that's not proof.
Use a non Christian source
I linked you
I'll link you again: https://creation.com/cheating-with-chance
A source like that is biased
All sources are biased
Why on earth would you use creation.com to support your position about scientific matters?