Message from @Cephas
Discord ID: 679509896496283688
My sources are biased on creation
@Cobra Commander Don't discredit a source because it's biased, because then you wouldn't be able to count any source as credible
Biased is a bad thing you know that right?
That article is literally nothing but a long argument from incredulity
That isnt evidence for god's existence
No, go find a source that has *actual* evidence of God's existance or *actual* proof debunking evolution and doesn't essentially say "this has low probability of occurring so lets take something with zero proof at all as fact instead."
Low probability =/= impossible.
@Cobra Commander They got the information from mathematicians and scientists. Sure, they are creation scientists, but your scientists are evolutionary scientists. Both use their world view as a starting point. You can't discredit someone just because they are creationist just like I can't discredit someone because they are evolutionist.
Got it
Just a sec
"creation science" is not science
Yeah
Read this.
@Cobra Commander if you want to meet God and have him prove his existence to you, it's fairly trivial.
Not a single scientist is cited in your first source also
Only if you care tho.
It explains what I want to explain better then I can explain it.
Satans cooler anyway
I don't, nor am I against the idea of one existing, I'm arguing about tangible evidence.
Nah
Pretty chil dude
Does satan even exist?
Nnah
Well then, you don't have any. I don't have any. It's all about what's more probable
You clearly haven't met Satan.
Your right
You admit to not having any evidence for the existence of god?
Yes
Do you guys want to know how to knock on God's door?
Nothing in your second source has anything close to evidence of any kind
@Cobra Commander You don't have any tangible evidence. I don't have any tangible evidence. It all depends on which theory is more probable
We dont need tangible evidence
I literally gave you examples of tangible evidence
You are the one claiming god exists
GG @!.MESSIEH, you just advanced to level 4!
I don't need probability to know that a God exists.
in support of a *possible* explanation of life appearing
The burden of proof is on you to prove that