Message from @!.MESSIEH
Discord ID: 679508638867521561
smh
וםו
ךםך
@Cobra Commander First off, an assertion: The vast amount of intelligence around us points to a creator. I mean, do you really think all of this complexity was made by random chance?
Now, proof: The probability of the chance formation of a hypothetical functional ‘simple’ cell, given all the ingredients, is acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 10e+57800. That's 10 with over 57,800 zeros behind it.
Yes i do believe things can happen on their
Own
So you don't have proof
Dude, did you see the next part?
And you probably don't understand how that's not proof.
Use a non Christian source
I linked you
I'll link you again: https://creation.com/cheating-with-chance
A source like that is biased
All sources are biased
Why on earth would you use creation.com to support your position about scientific matters?
Your sources are biased on evolution
No not proper scientific evidence and research
My sources are biased on creation
@Cobra Commander Don't discredit a source because it's biased, because then you wouldn't be able to count any source as credible
That article is literally nothing but a long argument from incredulity
That isnt evidence for god's existence
No, go find a source that has *actual* evidence of God's existance or *actual* proof debunking evolution and doesn't essentially say "this has low probability of occurring so lets take something with zero proof at all as fact instead."
Low probability =/= impossible.
@Cobra Commander They got the information from mathematicians and scientists. Sure, they are creation scientists, but your scientists are evolutionary scientists. Both use their world view as a starting point. You can't discredit someone just because they are creationist just like I can't discredit someone because they are evolutionist.
Got it
Just a sec
"creation science" is not science
Yeah
Read this.
@Cobra Commander if you want to meet God and have him prove his existence to you, it's fairly trivial.
Not a single scientist is cited in your first source also
Only if you care tho.
It explains what I want to explain better then I can explain it.
Satans cooler anyway
I don't, nor am I against the idea of one existing, I'm arguing about tangible evidence.
Satan is a terrifyingly toxic tyrant.
Nah
Pretty chil dude