Yes, it is.

Nobody says science can’t change

But the word of god doesn’t change

But this is not how it is _used_ or thought of by society.

People _do_ rely on science as a 'truthful' guide. Even when science does change.

I don’t see people going to worship science on a weekend

Lol

You do, actually.

How so?

Not in the same way

You see it used often in specific ideologies. Including your own, probably. But any ideology that cites 'scientific data' as a resource of belief.

It's almost _exactly_ the same.

Kind-of funnily, most eminent scientists were a form of religious.

That doesn't really matter though.

We'll use feminism, I guess.

You've seen feminists cite bad science to give credibility to their worldview, I'm sure.

1 in 4 men, for example.

Science is derivative of the 'truth' concept developed by religion, too.

Again, that doesn't really matter, just an aside.

Look at Bill Nye the Science Guy's new show.

I think you are muddling point of view and taking things out of context

As that’s what science says

No the actual tests should be the honesty

Not someone’s wired article on AI

I'm muddying nothing. I'm trying to bring clarity to you about how science is corrupted to dubious end like religion can be.

GG @Nyynth, you just advanced to level 4!

Oh yes I see that it can be corrupted

Sure

Doesn’t make it a belief system

Like religion

It ... is a belief system. You can ask other atheists what they believe in.

As with science you can duplicate the results

And they'll tell you science and reason or some other version of it.

For confirmation

You can’t do that with religion

Religion is ideally built on duplicated events as well.

I can’t duplicate anything in any bible

This is why religions borrow from each other, but I'll use an easy example.

I'm about to.

So I don’t see how that point stands

Sodom and Gomorrah is a story about what.