Message from @ashnaa
Discord ID: 575312673861009408
i say no because if the father wants to be apart of the childs life it wouldnt be fair if the mother just stripped him of that ability by having an abortion
i mean if you dont wanna take care of the child and the father does
and hes not abusive or anyhting
just let him take care of it
but that still means you're a mother
like
that goes back to bodily autonomy
it's the woman's body that actually has to be the 'host' of the fetus
if the FATHER wants a baby, then why can't he adopt?
why adopt when your wife/girlfriend has your biological baby
bc she doesn't want to have your biological baby
if she doesnt want to have his biological baby
then dont have unprotected sex
then contraceptives should be made more readily available
idealistically, they should have the whole children conversation before having sex (even if it is protected)
you can literally walk into your local pharmacy and buy condoms and birth control
condom isnt 100%
none are
theres still a chance
^
a very slim chance
maybe bad luck is just there
bam and you pregnant
you can't put restrictions on unprotected sex tho
i mean it is dumb to have it if you dont want a baby
you shouldnt be allowed to kill a child all because of a slim chance in birth controlfailure
you're not killing it bc birth control failed
you're 'killing' it because you don't want to/are not ready to/can't be a mother yet
and thats why you combine the 'pill' with condoms
if your not ready to be a mother/father then wear a condom
regardless of how low the failure rate is
condoms have what a 98% chance of success
yes i agree that you should
but having unprotected sex doesn't give you less of a choice on whether you want to keep your baby or not
like what if a 16 year old doesn't use contraceptives
adoption
lol
a 16 year old shouldnt be having sex in my opinion but
you agreed that the system is messed up tho
no one would want their child to live in bad circumstances