Message from @thomas the choo choo tree
Discord ID: 575332869224792075
Yeetus that fetus
*yeetus
So if a person has no brain activity, with the guarantee that they will be 100% recovered in a few months, we should be able to kill them?
yes
wdym recover
Definitely
you recover brain activity?
have they had brain activity in the past
See, when you draw the line anywhere besides conception, you end up being able to apply it to a group of people still living.
Yes but I want to kill them as well
So past brain activity is what defines life now?
bruh
was this not alive?
no
The only problem with your argument
@Deleted User That's a new born child not an aborted child
late term abortions exist
Not that late my dude
not like late abortion
like earlier ones
as billcat said, we're addressing the majority
Doctors examining the patient will conduct a battery of tests to determine whether any brain activity is present. If all brain activity is absent, the patient is dead.
If an indvidual is brain dead
they should be killed
That was literally a premature baby, not an abortion.
yes
During 2012, 92% of abortions were performed before 14 weeks' gestation, 6% between 14–20 weeks, and 2% (n=96) at a later stage.
"No. The brain will never recover when it dies. Since the patient has already been declared dead, removing the machine (which is artificially pumping air into the lungs) cannot cause further harm or death."
The brain doesnt come back
Brain activity can be regained after loss, yes. It's incredibly rare but it does occur. What I say, specifically was if you know a person will be 100% recovered in several months, meaning normal brain activity, would it be moral to kill them?
its dead
so saying that they might recover is not a thing
its dead
you cant revive
The fetus prior to brain activity is as alive as a germ