Message from @bink
Discord ID: 628067711360172042
I'm not saying that there isn't hate crime going on in other countries
I'm just saw that statically these areas during these times will lead you being killed just by one factor
Rednecks hate muslims, russians hate muslims, chinese hate muslims
A lot of people have a lot of hate
Right but if a single person is killed for a single reason in a developed country than that is a hate crime
By definition
@RoiKadmon you're better at debunking follow ups than me can you help me out
@RoiKadmon you also forgot to give yourself more roles (look at mine as a cheatsheet for what you should add)
Fyi he's not my boyfriend just my best friend
<:GAY:583247406909358083>
Wtf is an ap?
Ancap
@RoiKadmon you're also better at definitions
It's an Anarcho-Capitalist.
An Anarchist is someone who doesn't support the existence of government and believes society is better conducted by having the individual make his / her own decisions. (In a sense, this is the 'far end' of the Libertarian side.)
What are your views on morals
@RoiKadmon no men's rights activist role smh bad boi
Also the anarchist and gamer roles
do you think they exist
I'm personally not an activist since I haven't done anything on the issue, so I thought it wouldn't be fitting to call myself one.
Also, bink, were you asking me?
or is there no such thing as morality
Morality is subjective
Murder is moral if you believe it's right
And immoral if you think it's wrong
So would these morals apply to a person and their family unit
What should there be which would stop a person making his children into slaves
The only way to be an immoral person is if you belive morality isn't subjective
@bink general morality
The majority think murder is immoral
That would be general morality
Or majority morality
Or mass subjectivity
Btw these aren't terms I just am splicing words together that suit my purpose
I believe that as humans evolved over time, they developed a sense of right and wrong that allowed them to survive better as a specie. For example, inflicting pain unjustifiably was conceived to be a bad thing, because it would be bad evolutionarily speaking to fight against one's own specie, and especially towards one's own family.
That is, in a sense, 'biological' morality, which I think is closer to objective, although, perhaps it could have been different if we were another specie that survived in another way.
As to 'cultural' morality, I believe this is closer to the subjective side as each culture can 'decide' what it views as moral and immoral based on a set of principles which may be detached from the evolutionary morality.
Objectivity is also false
As a concept
It's wrong
Nothing is objective
There's objective beyond a reasonable doubt
But what makes it immoral
Because the majority say it's immoral
It's objective beyond a reasonable doubt that oxygen exists (the way it wouldn't be is if everything was a simulation)