not really

Yes there are. I'm not even commenting on validity or anything, the fact is that the internet has at least a few sources on most things.

Maybe because you think that, that's why you always want easily accessible sources.

But it's an incorrect thing to think

i never stated I wanted only easily accessible sources

Many sources I use are from physical books

I sometimes provide the book names

The slow twitch, fast twitch muscle thing for example is commonly accepted

and backed up by empirical evidence

as is the hormonal thing amongst races

Observation of phenotypical features and understanding the underlying biological forces that produce them is a skill that can't easily be taught. I can't teach it to you, you have to learn it on your own.

Biology and Crime by C.R. Jeffery is quite good.

Book

I don't really care about university databases that you use nor was I saying that they're worse than the internet, as I wasn't addressing that. Again, you can also find sources for things on a variety of search engines and you haven't substantiated an argument against this claim other than a comment on my thinking, which isn't an argument and just a deflection. Physical books also have a tendency to become obsolete after a few years.

The idea that they become obsolete is false. Most of the time they do not.

It depends on what the topic is

Siege by James Mason is not obsolete

🤬

Also, there aren't necessarily superior scientific opinions persay. You should always be cross checking new paradigms with the old ones

Seeing what fits together with other things

many new psychological theories are total garbage

for example

I also never argued against that. As time goes on new information is going to be discovered on a topic, meaning that a previously published book is not going to have that info and is then obsolete in and of itself

yet we hold them to a higher regard than the old ones that fit more with everything else

Why does this have to do with gender

Woman like man

Man like woman

Have baby

Shut up

The behavior of law by donald black is also a classic

you have to read and understand things that aren't always necessarily related to piece things together

not related on a surface examination but related upon deep analysis

Hm...

Siege isn't a scientific text, it's a neo nazi propaganda book. it's irrelevent and bullshit.

Bruh

Lmao

I never said it was

Right so how exactly does it relate to the topic of books becoming obsolete?

It’s revolutionary red pills that scare centrists and continue to scare centrist

books becoming obsolete is propaganda in itself

Therefore, it’s not obsolete