but you guys have to realize that jihadi =/= terrorist

Never a Muslim I guess

That still dosen't tell me how they got that number?

All alone wolves

Because it dosen't tell you how they defined "jihadist"

Jihadi fought against the west

the article specifically states the jihadists are identified as "potential terrorists" not terrorists

So they are even worse

Exactly

Dude

It's a fucking vague definiton

And the number is pretty much meaningless

well it may be vague but you know where the number is coming from

Yes like potential terrorist is pretty bad

no, the number is not meaningless

It means they have a likely to@do it

Ok so @beyond_gravity How do you define potential terroist

What is the definition

It means they are likely to kill people as a terrorist

You could interpret that in so many different ways

he's not the one who wrote the article

Do you not understand English

exactly so he dosent fucking know

he's not the intel officers deciding

Jesus bro

You are stupid

I hope you die in a terorist attaxk

So he cant use the data to say "there are this number of potential terror threats in the uk at this time"

Because he dosen't know what the number fucking means

yes he can

I said I hope you die in a terrorist attack

it's reasonable to assume intel officers are being reasonable with their definitions

For all he knows it could be people who once went to a mosque which a terrorist always went to or it could be people actively planning a terror attack

You muppet

you are trying to take a number you don't like and just throw it out and that's unreasonable

I'm not saying they're being unreasonable with their definitions

I'm saying you don't know what the definiton is

so what?

we know what the word jihadi generally means

do you really?

Give me the definition of jihad