I'm not defending him being a warlord

You got some mo loving going on

But I'm saying that's not many casualties

Compared to pretty much every other war in history

Which is a fact

then why did you bring up that there were only 1000 casualties?

So that makes it ok?

He killed less

Guess he’s a good guy

Because you were overstating the significance of it

back then people were being killed by worse weapons.

I never said he was the best guy or anything

we are more efficient at killing now, and there's more people to kill

He probably would have killed way more

If he could

He preaches war

My point is you were calling him a "warlord to the worst degree" and he clearly isn't even though eh iw warmongering

Therefore he is a war lord

Granted, Muhammad wasn't like Ghengis Khan or anything but still

Also Islam doesn't preach war no matter what Muhammad did

we can admit he's a warlord at least

The worst degree because he spun up an entire religion

Based on war

Kill the non believers

The Qu'ran dictates a very small set of circumstances under which its justified to go to war you do realise

yeah I think there were worse warlords but w/e

And it says that its unjustified to go to war in any other scenario

Yea except those loop holes

that's a pretty mild objection to make

Are there loopholes?

Say you can go@after infidels

Nah

Sure whenever an infidel is involved

Those aren't part of the religion

Dude you are picking and choosing

Those are what scumbags have added so that they can use the religion to justify their wars

I doubt you have read the entire Quran

I doubt you have

I haven’t

exactly

But you claim to know@it