Also because this isn't a problem that we've only seen in London

@The Lemon Again, failure by all parties, including the Tories

Its just people only focus on London because its the most diverse area

I'd say mostly the Tories

No money for knife crime but still extra money for some missing bitch in Portugal

Pathetic

And plenty of money for trident!

And Theresa claims that austerity is over...

Tories do too many cuts and Labour do too little

And Lib Dems are...

*Sighs*

Lol

We need a Yang

Only good thing Lib Dems did was piss off Goldsmith

I do like that personally

Fuck Goldsmith

Ok, so I did some digging, and it turns out London refuses to release it's crimes broke down into ethnic contribution. However, I was able to find a graph for almost every other city in the country

This is just an example of some cities, I can post more if you want

Wow so you were making claims based off no evidence?

Comparing London to the rest of the UK is like comparing Cali to the rest of the US

Again that shows typically asians are barely higher than either the average or the rate for white people

Nope, there is your evidence. Replace "london" with, say,, West Midlands.

Hence the idea that immigration from asia is the cause of this is ludicrous

Once again, you're taking half of my argument and twisting it

No I'm really not

I honestly dislike London as the capital city.

It has fallen from the beauty it once was

I ***specifically have said over and over that immigration is only part of a wider issue*** and you continue to say "but this is pr00f immigration no issue"

Not really

Gaymer moment.

Liverpool is the East London of the North

My claim was literally nothing more than the fact that, for whatever reason, ethnic minorities, meaning not just asians but all ethnic minorities, are much more likely to commit crime, especially in inner cities. I believe this is because of a toxic inner city culture, that promotes young boys from poor minority households to participate in gang culture and so on and so forth.

Hated by Parliament

Ok but that's entirely removed from what you were originally saying

This rhetoric that you were using earlier is what I was taking the most issue with

If you have now changed your stance on how immigrants contribute to crime statistics fine but I doubt you've changed your opinions that dramatically in the space of an hour

Yes, I said that, because it's true. I still agree with that statement. I'm claiming that it contributes to a wider problem.

Just because I did not elaborate several hours ago on a question not yet asked does not mean I have somehow changed my stance

But whenever I say that you are talking about immigrants you say **"No I'm not talking about immigrants"**

You're outright lying about what I've said.