hobbes vs locke

easy

hobbes

the state of nature where man is actually chimp

and chimps out everywhere

then the elite nordic ruling class comes out of nowhere and ensures an escape from this state of nature

Im with Hobbes too

i like locke

we have natural rights

Natural rights granted by man

monarchs protect our natural rights while dictators strip em

Monarchist dynasties tend to cling onto power, while under the Philosophy King system the leader who is the most patriotic, charismatic, physically and mentally fit, Hawkish and dovish interchangeably while having Masculine Altruism to care for his people is the one who gets to control the state.

monarchs are trained from youth to rule

@Deleted User Vote where?

hobbes or locke?

Pericles ?

implying the philosopher king

isnt the monarch

under aristotle's definition

also the philosopher king isnt even charismatic

you are thinking of a democratic leader

They have the same power, however the Philosophy King isn’t bound to a bloodline

the philosopher king is literally born out of "gold" class

and once you start mixing the metal like "gold" and "silver" you no longer have the ideal philosopher-king

Bloodline leadership is key to true patriotism

I’m adding onto what Plato wrote

bloodline lmao

that's what literally plato writes

that everyone in his republic is born from a certain metal class

with gold being the leader and advisor of the system

with silver being the guardian (hence the military)

and bronze being the producers

Well he’s taking about a Caste system.

guys:
POLL
What race and where are you from?

and if caste system are not from bloodline

then i dont know how man

plato does not mention how u can move up in a caste system

Caucasian - Manchester UK

simply mentions you are born into it

so there is a certain bloodline that attracts certain traits

It's not to mention that plato was basically fucking around