Your definition is actually inaccurate for not including this

What? No

I disagree with that

all around he's implying that this means superiority, he's saying that non-white people will fail due to their supposed genetic disposition

why would the truth (if it is true) racist?

Yes, this is how the word is used

that's a claim of superiority logically

No its not

ACknowledging is not the same as evaluating

Calm down little kid

Do you want me to take a survey? because this is so obvious to everyone else in this convo

like using my own two eyes i can understand what he's implying and getting at

I do not care what everyone else thinks

lol I see no reason why fact is racist

But that's the basis for a definition, common usage

You are just too incompetent to realize that acknowleding isnt the same as fucking evaluating

@Sentient23 and you're just saying the same thing over and over again

Common OVERALL usage, not common usage on a fucking discord server

No, stop making up strawmans

Yes because you're too lolw iq

Ok i dont have time wasting with any more of you retards

bye

do you need him to explicitly say it in order for you to get his drift

it's called suggestions

lol

obviously

if you're saying non-white people will fail in society due to their genes

>idc what everyone else thinks

that's obviously implying a sense of superiority

it's called logic you fucking dick head

wait.

did he just leave

he was a fucking dipshit

oh he left

I can't even @ him

Why do think white supremacist say whites are smarter? this whole whites are smarter than all other races and thus superior has been a thing since the early 1800s, and it’s the same argument white supremacists use even today

I just want to know the statistics

Imma look them up

@Katze Miaulitzer trust me when i say there's much more than statistics needed to wrap your whole head around this debate

true

If it is fact then it would be harsh, but if it isn't then I don't know