@Tyberius D I'm sorry but there is a form of Marxism that can be seen in socialism mate

Which is?

What was that graph all about

Russia's educated population is dying out.

Marxism is one of the many forms of communism bte

Bte

Btw

@Tyberius D all it shows is the population so that isn't really evidence

I don't understand how people aren't "educated"

You have the Marxism/Communism statement backwards.

Russian education system collapsed with the wall, and was primarily male.

@Tyberius D OK when the wall was up why was there so much poverty in eastern/comunist side

We are smarter then what we were back then except feminists obviously

You act like most of those nations are better off economically post collapse.

Well I've got to say in the economic way pre collapse was better but the way they treated there population was horrible

Agreed

I'm sorry you sound like you want to bring socialism back why don't we try and mix the riches of socialism with peace bcs you have to think pre collapse communists where cunts

You like to draw conclusions that aren't stated don't you?

OK sorry your centrist sorry my bad I've never heard of centrist care to explain what it is?

Socialism like Capitalism has its issues. I always support some version of a mix because we have seen that highly capitalist and socialist structures don't work out well.

What governs how much you should have I have color coded on this map. The blues and greens should be more capitalist, the orange and reds more socialist.

Yea but what are centrists?

Oh, my bad. Mis read there.

Centrists are political moderates.

So your in between the leftists and right

@Deleted User T-14 Armata is shit, I also so have a knowldege of military stuff so...

@Tyberius D and Estonia is not a slavic country, far from it. Its like saying china is slavic

1@McBacoon You're not really stating any reasons why you think its bad.

So...

T-14 Armata is a hype beast. Because its a new weapon system, as usual Russia hypes it up with statements like "abrams killer" "best tank there is". Russia specifically madr this tank to have an answer to USA-s Abrams. Russias current tank doctrine (since pre ww2) is "alot of good enough tanks". With T-14 they tried to change that. But there are multiple problems: the tank itself, strategy and tactics. 1) The tank itself is a pure hypebeast. I get thats still kinda in development (like the F-35), but what we can tell from offical footage, its not good. The tank has never been seen to operate its vertical stabilization. When it has been firing, the tank can be seeing oscillate back and forth, and under dampened movement like this is bad and much worse on a moving tank. T-14 uses auto-loader, and most tankers are pretty sure that its not a a very reliable system, as it enters re-loading phase, the gun is still seen not in control of its recoil. There is also evidence that T-14 has problem with accuracy, that is probably caused with wrong ammo screening data and/or gun not being stabilized. Its a hype beast that gun outgunned by M1A2 SepV3. 2) The strategy: Russia simply cannot use this tank. They can, but only a few, because they simply dont have enough money to build them, let alone operate them. If they really-really wanted to, they could make a T-14 division in 20 years. But considering Russia has 20K tanks, it really counts for nothing. The current plan that was to build 100 tanks, has also been put to hold. 3) tactics. Russia fared pretty badly with their armour units in Checnya and Georgia. Obviously they have learned something, but Ukraine wasnt eny better either. If russia doesent learn how to use their tanks WITH infantry, meaning that the infantry covers the tank from RPG-s from buildings etc...

@Deleted User

I think I have stated my reasons.

Now you have, yes.

Sorry for making a mess... I wrote this on my phone... so not much of a way to make it less cancer looking

You're right, my mistake.

<a:iwank:454778651955822612>

<a:398237697485045762:511986511403548682>

I just read your book. I'm not privy to info on the 14 but I don't doubt anything you said.

What I have heard was the Russians went defense heavy with this tank, but we won't know how good the armor is until it's deployed and shot at.

I'm pretty sure Russia's tank backbone is ment to be the T-90MS. They have continued to build the 90 family for the last 25 years.

Russia´s backbone is still T-72 and T-80

I have also heard of the T-14 going "defense heavy" but no exact info so... but they do use Afghanit

here, my friend sums it up pretty good: https://youtu.be/L2nAVzKUVRE

What is his creditals?