Lol

Typical Adolfo

Always hating on the J

@McBacoon North Korea still isn't a problem. They still have to miniaturize a nuke and somehow get it to the Americans. And even if they do that, we have a thousand for every one they have. MAD is a thing.

@German Soldier Like is there a bot code I could enter to get you to say something new and less stupid

Guess not

OH GOD ITS MULTIPLYING!

Now there are two

@Tyberius D They dont even need to launch that. NK doesent even need to reach mainland USA. Because all it needs is to have reach for Japan and SK. They will in time minituarize the nuke and will have a way to send it to USA. That gives them political and startegical leverage, ansd that is bad for you.

Don’t worry we have the high ground

Did someone program an Adolfo bot

Cause his AI is weak

<:NPC:509051323069497345>

*Pulls out soviet Russian flag and throws a snowball at* <@298217492030029824> 1v1 me

@McBacoon strategically it is no concern us. If you want to pick that fight we can, but it makes no real sense that we do that.

I personally am all for helping the South Koreans, but most of my nation is not.

@Tyberius D just because something is far away does not mean it ceases to exist or impact you

It’s like you don’t know the world is out there

It is and it wants blood

@beyond_gravity that is valid, see Pearl harbor. Problem, doesn't mean you can win the fight.

Yea

It’s hard to win these things

When there are no win situations all over

@Tyberius D The real leverage stands from not doing the action, but rather having the option to do that. All they need is a missile that can reach LA. and LA is much more prescious to you than some shithole Pyeongyang. The same applied with USSR during the cold war, so no side could be REALLY cocky as they had the MAD (Mutually assured destruction). And if it comes public that they have a missile that can reach LA, then you will start complaining and you will become interested. But then.. its too late.

@beyond_gravity I'm okay with no win situations. It tends to make people out think about their problems instead of out fighting them.

And not even mentioning US allies in the region... that are some of the biggest GDP-s in the world..

@McBacoon comparing it to the USSR made my point for me, and then you try to separate it for some reason. I don't care if the North Koreans can throw a nuke, there is no way they can use it and win.

Its not about winning in this scenario. Kim isnt stupid. Its about the nuke reaching LA.

or having the capability to do so

the same will repeat with Iran.

as USA-s allies will be in danger...

@McBacoon DOES NOT MATTER!

If they throw a nuke, they die. End of story.

@Tyberius D so does a large chunk of your country.

There is no way US will let NK throw the nuke. Which means, they will try to be more diplomatical.

which means, NK will have more leverage

i just want to say "never underestimate your enemy" D

@TheNobody we have 2 nazi accounts spamming arabic in here.

@McBacoon that is nowhere near accurate, but that is fine with me. IF people are actually stupid enough to trigger Armageddon we don't deserve to exist.

Your statements just demonstrate you have no proper knowledge of geo-politics and how they work. Being naive doesent help you in the long run.

I have evidence and the whole of USA-s diplomacy to backup my statements... so I feel pretty comfortable.

@McBacoon I will respect that we don't agree, but if you want to call me or ignorant on geopolitics you can stick it straight up your ass.

The USA diplomatically fucks up almost everything it does, and you yourself said we're a bunch of dumb bastards. So try to keep some consistency next time, as calling the Americans dumb and then saying their diplomacy backs up your opinion is fucking hypocritical.

```then saying their diplomacy backs up your opinion its fucking hypocritical.``` It backs up my opinion of that they are dumb bastards and they will also fuck up Iran like they did with NK.