@HisNameisBrentonTarrant Define success? Because that’s a fickle term and since people measure success differently it really begs the question that you probably do care.

@Deleted User , @HisNameisBrentonTarrant Did you really just ask all that? White people proliferated the most number of diseases, they also so aren't in control of whether refugees get admitted, besides America is literally the product of refugees from Europe, white people initiated slavery on all other races, who tf do they expect to eradicate slavery? Yoda?

Altruism? More like failed attempts at cleaning up their own mess

Wow you guys are still fighting?

How can I not? This is ridiculous

Oh

Welp gn lads

Gn

See you guys in 6 hours

Have a good one

Casper, where you from?

Bayous of Louisiana?

In the 60s

@BlackHawk White people eradicated Malaria in Panama, Australia, Indonesia, especially in Bali, and continue to eradicate Malaria within Africa. White people and white states lead the fight in trying to cure Ebola recently. It’s not fair to say that because white people unknowingly spread diseases into non-white lands to the point where you could call it proliferation. Would you hold any other empire up to the same standard? Ie the mongols. Even though Europeans were the ones who lead medical science to discover how to cure the diseases they bought? You didn’t debunk my point about foreign aid refugee relief. Its misleading to call America a product of white refugees, Because America was a product of white immigrants. If I have to explain to you what the difference is then you’re not as big brained than you let on. The first known occurrence of slavery was between Black tribes in central Africa. Da white man dindu nothing there. The first popularly recognised civilisation to adopt slavery was ancient Egypt, which you could argue was Souther European. However, today the only group of people that have formally eradicated slavery are Europeans in their corners of the world. Slavery is present still within South America, Africa, Arabia, and Asia.

@Kammlionn @APROUDSCOTSMAN I’m from Australia.

The things you are saying would be not considered racist if you weren't comparing the accomplishments of white people to other races

Yes, white people have made a lot of accomplishments, that does not make them *better*

My argument was that measurably speaking the white race as a group is more humane and altruistic than other groups. Therefore, if this group is demographically destined to die. How could you have a humane world?

Same can be said for the dinosaurs. Why don't you care about them?

But as a group they shared a similar culture and you are saying that that way of thinking that people in the west have is purely dependent on race

@Kammlionn That doesn’t make sense.

Yes it does

They demographically fuckin died. Is that ok?

It’s race and culture are inseparably intertwined regardless. You can’t call yourself a Chinese person without being genetically Chinese.

You’re missing a key premise here though. Were dinosaurs altruistic?

Who the fuck cares? A race dying off because of the environment is not inhumane

Omg🤣🤣

Scroll up and reread what I wrote you moron

‘’Inseparable intertwined ‘’ are you kidding me you think they had that way of thinking forever they had to come to that conclusion some how which would mean it’s not ingrained in there biology and besides that’s saying that people don’t have the capacity to change there cultures.

Why were you saying they would be demographically destroyed?

I’m admitting that your racial genotypes and phenotypes as well as your external environment; your culture have an indistinguishable role in how you think and act.

If you’re disagreeing with me there, you’re also disagree with Dr. Charles Darwin and James Watson.

@Kammlionn ugh😔

Yes, culture, not race

No, race and culture you moron.

What do you think a genotype and a phenotype are?

"Moron" its common sense that if I'm raised in a black area, I will share characteristics with those people. That is culture, not race

But to what extent is racial genotypes and phenotypes important I know that is some cases yea it can be a factor in how well you are gunna do but to what extent.

Not according to the Minnesota adoption study. White and black children preform relatively similar despite the environment of their adopted environment.

IQ is 50% hereditary according to the average physical anthropologist. IQ is a better predictor of long term success than education level.

Even so don’t you think in the way our system works meaning people that are more intelligent get to move up in life that there would be a selective breeding for more intelligent people seeing as those who aren’t as intelligent and be stuck in relative poverty would go to crime which would hinder the growth of that population and if so why do anything if it will work itself out.