Ok?

I know

I am asking what your point is

Its easy to write about fantastical ideas when your lifestyle is bliss.

Communism won't & never will work unless we have a global AI that controls more or less all forms of government or political power.

The Communist Manifesto was not a *Manifesto* on Communism. It was basically a fiction book

And uh

yeah define communism since you believe that the case

Communism destroyed China, nearly.

Communism is responsible for South & North Vietnam

Communism brought about the fall of the USSR

What has Capitalism done in comparison?

1. Ideologies aren't responsible for anything
2. None of these places were Communist
3. Capitalism has actually failed a shit load and if you think I'm kidding, why not see what all the great nations are living off of...they are rich due to the fact they exploit third world nations and use money as a pinnacle of control. keeps the trade flowing. Capitalism creates a society, doesn't mean a good one. Niggas in China are getting suicidal, same in Japan, same in the US. Why? Oh idk, maybe because they'll be wage slaves their whole life. Really the only reason Capitalism is around is the fact we have governments to go in and fix the faults. And even those just create problems

for example the ten year recession cycle and inevitable depression periods

1 and 3 contradict each other Cyborg.

Singaporean people would barely have houses

Capitalism is an ideology. A society following Capitalism is not an ideology

An ideology is a set of beliefs

2. Is false

Define Communism for me

As I asked before

A quick google search, visit to a museum or your local historian says those countries were communistic.

*woah these guys said it was communism, MUST BE!*

Communism is the end-goal for everyone to be treated equally and no social classes or "state" exist.

This is just as incoherent a the last guy

Well for one

People will produce what they can and everyone does their bit.

EVERY single nation you know of had a state

so it's already false

Secondly, equal *treatment* is just a proponent of egalitarianism.

That's why I said end-goal.

Thirdly, social classes still existed in these societies

*having an end goal is the same thing as having it*

Now you're contradicting

End goal is achieving it.

You really can't handle criticism it seems.

🤔

You can't admit No.1 and No.3 contradict each other, or can you?

*Says nations were communist*
*None of them meet your own criteria*
*Hm, seems you can't handle criticism*

No, they literally don't

You blamed an ideology, not people