like dude, take a course in argumentative logic, if the premise is faulty, the conclusion is unsound

The premise is not faulty

and here, the premise is the faulty firm supply curves

You’re just conflating two things

so it doesnt matter if the aggregation logic is sound

its aggregating false curves

No

Literally no

GREAT ARGUMENT!

^

GG @Lev, you just advanced to level 2!

Please tell me what you think a supply curve is

sophistry at its finest

the quantity of goods supplied at a particular pricing

It’s when a lady has a nice ass @Platinum Spark

I mean I don’t know what else to say when you just say something that’s not accurate

or other way around if you like

HAHA

>says its inaccurate
>has literally NO argument to back it up

Dude

you have nothing, so youre literally trying to find ANYTHING to trip me up and say HA GOTCHA

I’m currently making the argument

you arent

youre not typing shit

and you have made no other argument

Give her a chance

Ok, maybe shut up and listen

im waiting

So previously you said the supply curve was MCC above AVC correct?

yes

according to

neoclassical theory

its dumb, but its their definition

and they claim that their theory will give you an accurate curve for goods that are supplied at given prices

No

That is your mistake

Right here

You are conflating a curve to predict an individual firm’s behavior

bruh no

Great argument.

they use a false way of deriving a firm's supply curve