I am capitalist

I would say I'm a libertarian nationalist

i'm very right-wing, but I understand and respect what Socialists talk about

im not that much with nationalism but i didnt research about it so i cant critisize it

im kinda nationalist

It's become overblown, but basically nationalism just accepts that humans are social creatures, we aren't islands to ourselves

The 'tension' between the individualism of Libertarianism and the collectivism of nationalism I think gives us the best chance to enjoy the benefits of both

the thing is that now days Nationalism has a lot of different definitions

i guess i only know one

GG @tuna hair extensions, you just advanced to level 2!

The kind of policy recommendations will depend on how far you think the collectivism should go or how it manifests

which is that every ethnic group are free to rule themselves

for me, it's national defense, and controlling/handlign externalities

I believe in a small government with a capitalist economy and conservative values

i dont like a very divided world

imo

Are u anti imperialist?

I'm against small government despite being a libertarian because I think national defense and externalities are just realities that must be accepted

no, again, i cant say i am because i didnt research about it

i only criticize when i research

about something

I would be an anarchist otherwise, and in my heart I am, but I understand too much about system dynamics to enjoy the bliss of ignorance

I belive that the world does need a world peace keeper like the US

I'm pro Pax Americana, for earth and for the US

WE don't need rest of the world in an arms race with each other

Anarchic is bad and truly impossible to accomplish

You can have it, if you extend the principle in ways socialists and syndicalists do

well race creates competition which creates tech

they focus on the realistic implications, instead of the ideolism of liebrtarianism, which ignores the real world consequences of large corporations, etc

im not so pro-american

nah you don't need an arms race for technology at all, it gives you a certain type of tech

People always look to have power and thats how small groups start forming until u get a goverment again

the tech growth comes from loose credit and experimentation

@Sh0t yep u need

thats how planes got invented

jet airplanes

people invent for all sorts of reasons, logistics people invent all the time

the advances get borrowed into the military sphere sometimes, sometimes the other way

war makes people more productive

the root issue is the credit expansion to fuel the experiments, you can't 'legislate' innovation

you need 50 experiments in parallel, some fail, some stick around and change the game