Message from @Woodmill

Discord ID: 684856307030818851


2020-03-04 20:11:39 UTC  

676447143531380738

2020-03-04 20:11:55 UTC  

It was a moral judgement, not a statement of intent

2020-03-04 20:12:05 UTC  

Deleted User10/02/2020
I would absolutely execute her given the chance. We’re in a fight for our lives here and people like her are lining up on the wrong side

2020-03-04 20:12:10 UTC  

Deleted User10/02/2020
I would kill her with a smile on my face. She absolutely deserves the rope.

2020-03-04 20:12:16 UTC  

That’s a statement of policy

2020-03-04 20:12:20 UTC  

X_x

2020-03-04 20:12:23 UTC  

Your account got deleted

2020-03-04 20:12:26 UTC  

Obviously I would never threaten anyone

2020-03-04 20:12:29 UTC  

It never got revised

2020-03-04 20:12:37 UTC  

You never apologized either

2020-03-04 20:12:42 UTC  

Must be thinking of someone else then

2020-03-04 20:12:46 UTC  

Even the mods agreed it was completely out of place, even Vlad

2020-03-04 20:12:52 UTC  

Where is Vlad?

2020-03-04 20:12:57 UTC  

Are we discussong economic issues? Cause I don't fucking think so

2020-03-04 20:13:01 UTC  

Vlad left because he was sick of you

2020-03-04 20:13:12 UTC  

Lol

2020-03-04 20:13:19 UTC  

But back to the issue at hand

2020-03-04 20:13:45 UTC  

"statement of policy"

2020-03-04 20:13:59 UTC  

@Woodmill Do you think the gold standard prolonged the Great Depression by preventing the Federal Reserve from expanding the money supply?

2020-03-04 20:14:27 UTC  

Yes

2020-03-04 20:14:33 UTC  

Haha

2020-03-04 20:14:42 UTC  

Good q

2020-03-04 20:14:53 UTC  

You guys know Sophie tried to ban me before while in a conversation she wasn't even in

2020-03-04 20:15:00 UTC  

And when that failed, she muted me instead

2020-03-04 20:15:03 UTC  

"Was just a joke"

2020-03-04 20:15:04 UTC  

Can we drop it please

2020-03-04 20:15:11 UTC  

Leave the infighting to the far left

2020-03-04 20:15:15 UTC  

And alt right

2020-03-04 20:15:19 UTC  

The new deal was a driving reason why the great depression persisted, i.e it increased the recovery time.

2020-03-04 20:15:42 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ Ah, the Austrian perspective

2020-03-04 20:16:28 UTC  

Well I would say it's mainstream accepted now

2020-03-04 20:17:12 UTC  

I would check this paper
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/wp/wp597.pdf
> There are two striking aspects of the recovery from the Great Depression in the United States: the recovery was very weak and real wages in several sectors rose significantly above trend. These data contrast sharply with neoclassical theory, which predicts a strong recovery with low real wages. We evaluate the contribution of New Deal cartelization policies designed to limit competition and increase labor bargaining power to the persistence of the Depression. We develop a model of the bargaining process between labor and firms that occurred with these policies, and embed that model within a multi-sector dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that New Deal cartelization policies are an important factor in accounting for the post-1933 Depression. We also find that the key depressing element of New Deal policies was not collusion per se, but rather the link between paying high wages and collusion.

2020-03-04 20:17:14 UTC  

More than it used to be for sure

2020-03-04 20:17:19 UTC  

Yeah

2020-03-04 20:17:47 UTC  

That’s pretty widely discredited, even in Chicago circles people accept Keynesian economics were required to correct demand side failures

2020-03-04 20:18:27 UTC  

"Keynesian economics"?

2020-03-04 20:18:40 UTC  

Yes, are you familiar?

2020-03-04 20:18:56 UTC  

I mean it's a wide term, there's not so much something called "Keynesian economics" anymore.

2020-03-04 20:19:14 UTC  

Anyways, the paper above.
> We find that New Deal cartelization policies are an important factor in accounting for the post-1933 Depression

2020-03-04 20:19:30 UTC  

That’s not accurate, do you have a question about what Keynesian economics refers to with regard to the Great Depression?