also wtf is Anacrho-Marxism?

Anarchy is merely a tool for those willing enough to use it, to take power for themselves.

besides they weren't socialist they sold off a large chunk of they're state industry to capitalists

Correct, which is why Hitler should have been replaced in the early stages.

You said up in chat that Hitler was a socialist

He was, but not far enough

wtf

State industry is part of socialism

private industry would be abolished

Next time it will be ten times more National, and ten times more Social

Next time, it will be National Stalinism.

Esoteric Juche

For Germanic ethnicities within Central Europe

You don't understand what national socialism is. You think national socialism is nationalism + socialism, but if we are to take Nazi Germany as the prime example of what national socialism is, we realise that this is not that case. Socialism is very much against privitizing industry, the Nazis however privitised much of the industry, menaing it wasn't at all socialist. It's not even comparable to the NEP or New Democracy, as those were small privitizatioon measures after much of everything was nationalized, unlike in Hitlers Germany which had majority private industry and very loose restraints on the capitalists. Also Hitlers Germany was right wing nationalist, which is anti marxist, unlike vietnam which was left wing nationalist. Right wing nationalism seeks to conquer while left wing nationalism is about national liberation

Correct, which is why the ideal course of things would have seen Hitler replaced with someone who would not stray from the original doctrine, Goebbels for instance.

Then why did you say Hitler was a Socialist?

He was

Be a Strasserist lol

He trusted the bourgeois class to much

That is why Germany lost the war

That is why Stalin won

What exactly was the original doctrine then?

wait if Hitler was a socialist then why did he side with fascist Italy and imperial Japan?

Geopolitical convenience

Why did he attack the USSR?

As I said, WW2 was not ideological in the slightest

Romania

It was simply the continuation of European geopolitics

As WW3, WW4, WW5, etc etc, will be the continuation of European geopolitics

but you said this wasn't ideological

Ideologies are leveraged to lay down common doctrine, to rally support from populations, but Warfare is about geopolitics

The ideology is the foundation from which an imperialist nation can expand

no it was about lebensraum

Which is the continuation of German geopolitics

Ever since the Germanic tribal confederations existed, there were wars for Lebensraum

Which was 3.000 years ago.

no its the expansion of living space for the germans to expand they're empire

Yes, this has been a thing for thousands of years

Slavs used to occupy up to the Elbe river

They kind of do now, again, because of WW2

😃