Message from @cony
Discord ID: 608403154320752672
<:wise:583660654288830494>
same
They're not even able to use the bathroom by themselves
And they will all be dead in a decade
Literally all
What are you guys talking about
Because it's a handful of people 100+ or so
<a:thonkspin:583660141136838657>
Also let's us use a basic lesson in philosophy to explain AOCs comment based on her behaviour in public and her speeches and her public image shall we?
<a:thonkspin:583660141136838657>
But even then, I'll wager the actual "survivors" know it's not a dick measuring contest...most of all, they seem interested in spreading awareness and trying to prevent similar stuff from happening again
Grice's razor comes to play here to solve the problem
As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations
Look at the video
It's literally fox news
Oh look Fox News
They are concentration camps
Why would I care about their very one sided opinion and inaccurate reports
No look at the tweet
But still
The network that is willing to do anything to twist the story around
They are camps
look at the video the survivors posted '
just look
It's fox news
They probably twisted what she said to those survivors
nope
In fact I doubt they would have ever heard what she said
She said "are"
If fox news didnt seek them out
To tell them
Fox News is almost worse than CNN
To get some sort of leverage against her
True alex
hey you're forgetting what i said already
CNN is bad too
I don't even want to talk about this anymore
As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations
You're so unwilling to learn