'The resistance will die down within a generation'

Then I'm called evil for saying the obvious on how to crush local resistance - -

Kill/Drive off the locals, replace them with your own settlers

As evil as it sounds, logically it's very sound.

The locals supply the enemy with troops, food, housing, and weapons...

... Kill the locals?

The question is what does western man want there

Does he want the land ?

Slaves ?

Resources ?

Something else ?

If he doesnt want anything, which is the case, then GTFO

^

Only a globalized man could care about how Afghan people will rule themselves

I'm just talking in general, I don't care about the shithole and valley of shattered empires called Afghanistan

If it's about "Security" as they claim, they would have solved the problem at it's root

If you want somthing from another nation... destroy it, crush resistance and replace it with your own people.

I don't think something like that is even on the horizon today

Western people never needed to act like that at all

Again, this is logical, is it not?

Western man, let's say in Africa, did one simple thing

It's morals that stops us.

He never let the benefit of his own civilization to the local population

He never needed to fire a single bullet

Whites lived more quality life, had better longetivity, more healthy children

More offspring

Better farming, better food, better healthcare

better weapons

We constantly need better weapons, we constantly develop better weapons.

But he did not let black man use his hospitals, or walk down his pavements

its what Europeans are good at.

or use his railroads

or his medicines

He never developed welfare

And that was his oppression, from today's point of view

the so called "Segregation" (not giving his inventions to savages)

Ugh...

Why bother with segregation?...

When you can drive them out? If you're taking that much effort to seperate two populations...

In fact, for the most part, Western man didn't even give local population his money

Anyway.