Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd

Discord ID: 267051134403739658


2017-01-06 21:59:38 UTC  

Then it envolved into Imperialism of 'We will conquer them and enlighten them'

2017-01-06 21:59:51 UTC  

And then into "Invade the world, invite the world"

2017-01-06 21:59:51 UTC  

Then it turned into 'Well, we give them money to enlighten them to build schools and such'

2017-01-06 22:00:06 UTC  

Now it's 'Let them come to our country to enlighten them!'

2017-01-06 22:00:27 UTC  

It's probably going to turn into 'We need to enlighten ourselves about them!'

2017-01-06 22:00:30 UTC  

*Converts*

2017-01-06 22:00:48 UTC  

The only thing that remains in Western man's fatalistic outlook is "Let them..."

2017-01-06 22:02:32 UTC  

I don't understand. I have always thought... 'Why do people bother with Afghanistan?'

2017-01-06 22:02:51 UTC  

'If the locals put up soo much resistance, why don't you simply slaughter every last local in the area?'

2017-01-06 22:03:03 UTC  

'The resistance will die down within a generation'

2017-01-06 22:03:20 UTC  

Then I'm called evil for saying the obvious on how to crush local resistance - -

2017-01-06 22:03:38 UTC  

Kill/Drive off the locals, replace them with your own settlers

2017-01-06 22:04:46 UTC  

As evil as it sounds, logically it's very sound.

2017-01-06 22:05:08 UTC  

The locals supply the enemy with troops, food, housing, and weapons...

2017-01-06 22:05:12 UTC  

... Kill the locals?

2017-01-06 22:05:28 UTC  

The question is what does western man want there

2017-01-06 22:05:32 UTC  

Does he want the land ?

2017-01-06 22:05:34 UTC  

Slaves ?

2017-01-06 22:05:37 UTC  

Resources ?

2017-01-06 22:05:44 UTC  

Something else ?

2017-01-06 22:05:52 UTC  

If he doesnt want anything, which is the case, then GTFO

2017-01-06 22:06:05 UTC  

^

2017-01-06 22:06:20 UTC  

Only a globalized man could care about how Afghan people will rule themselves

2017-01-06 22:06:45 UTC  

I'm just talking in general, I don't care about the shithole and valley of shattered empires called Afghanistan

2017-01-06 22:06:57 UTC  

If it's about "Security" as they claim, they would have solved the problem at it's root

2017-01-06 22:07:12 UTC  

If you want somthing from another nation... destroy it, crush resistance and replace it with your own people.

2017-01-06 22:07:36 UTC  

I don't think something like that is even on the horizon today

2017-01-06 22:07:45 UTC  

Western people never needed to act like that at all

2017-01-06 22:07:59 UTC  

Again, this is logical, is it not?

2017-01-06 22:08:02 UTC  

Western man, let's say in Africa, did one simple thing

2017-01-06 22:08:05 UTC  

It's morals that stops us.

2017-01-06 22:08:29 UTC  

He never let the benefit of his own civilization to the local population

2017-01-06 22:08:34 UTC  

He never needed to fire a single bullet

2017-01-06 22:08:52 UTC  

Whites lived more quality life, had better longetivity, more healthy children

2017-01-06 22:08:55 UTC  

More offspring

2017-01-06 22:09:03 UTC  

Better farming, better food, better healthcare

2017-01-06 22:09:07 UTC  

better weapons

2017-01-06 22:09:21 UTC  

We constantly need better weapons, we constantly develop better weapons.

2017-01-06 22:09:26 UTC  

But he did not let black man use his hospitals, or walk down his pavements

2017-01-06 22:09:27 UTC  

its what Europeans are good at.

2017-01-06 22:09:29 UTC  

or use his railroads