or in cases of rape

@cony i couldnt care less if people try to justify it

or incest

doesn’t matter

not rape or incest

no abortion for either or

but there is no real, legitimate justification

that’s where we differ i think

there are no exceptions unless the mother would die

lol

high risk

there is a difference between attempting to justify something, and something being right

in my opinion

si

well, there are exemptions

that’s too far right for me

those are INCREDIBLY different things

nah

by your logic literally EVERYTHING is acceptable

if you’re saying a women has to carry an incest / rape baby

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!

You guys live in a perfect world lol

yeah im saying that

that’s something i can’t agree with

that’s weird

cuz otherwise its killing the baby

This is all idealism

Not practical

You know, it is hard to say what is right. Some people would asy that if it is in the constitution is right, so it is complicated

how can u argue that a baby should be able to get killed if it was concieved from rape or incest

it’s not his fault but at the same time

it’s not the mothers fault either

its not the baby's fault

lets talk about what really matters

when i say his i’m referring to the baby

my bad

taxation in theft

killing and carrying a baby for 9 months is different

ah

it’s no ones fault he’s there but like pregnancy isn’t easy

in abortion u terminate the life