hence the beautiful ones

sounds kinda like today's times

the right is machiavellian, and we look at how people actually are

leftism has this fantasy vision of people as "good" where "good" means passive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU

but passive also includes aggression

Well in Rightist societies

r/K theory is basically left vs right if you shifted it into political terms

Well, In traditional societies

posporo: i agree

good is what brings good results and bad is what brings bad results

first world versus third world

there is no absolute good or bad

@The Enlightened Shepherd agreed on results-driven assessment

like, helping the poor is always good

well its not good if 90% of people are beggars

help the poor by telling them to get a job at the facotry

it depends on who the poor are

or killing is always bad (christian teaching)

that's against nature itself

the Left simplifies

perhaps

killing isnt against christianity

One last trip to flavortowb

the religion doesnt condemn self defense

http://www.amerika.org/politics/confirmed-russia-was-not-the-source-of-dnc-hack/

or defensive war

or killing animals youll eat

http://www.amerika.org/politics/evidence-of-russian-state-hacking-of-dnc-is-thin/

seth rich?

European values, i have to agree with Nietzche there, have been completely confused

Many things that belong to the let have been smuggled into the Rightist discourse

Just take a look at the Neocons

left*

They did it with vocabulary

The concept of freedom in Traditional societies and concept of freedom in Pluralism

Their definitions of words

we must purify

Have assumptions in them

Yes, language is quite an impefect way speaking your mind

It can be "hacked"