perhaps

killing isnt against christianity

One last trip to flavortowb

the religion doesnt condemn self defense

http://www.amerika.org/politics/confirmed-russia-was-not-the-source-of-dnc-hack/

or defensive war

or killing animals youll eat

http://www.amerika.org/politics/evidence-of-russian-state-hacking-of-dnc-is-thin/

seth rich?

European values, i have to agree with Nietzche there, have been completely confused

Many things that belong to the let have been smuggled into the Rightist discourse

Just take a look at the Neocons

left*

They did it with vocabulary

The concept of freedom in Traditional societies and concept of freedom in Pluralism

Their definitions of words

we must purify

Have assumptions in them

Yes, language is quite an impefect way speaking your mind

It can be "hacked"

The definitions are changed to make thoughts lead a certain way

When using those words

Starting with the word "good"

Good is: not killing, or killing the people who need killing?

the word and label game is a lefitst cocnept

yes

Not really

history and continuity of past is a rightist game

but

why talk about what matters when you can argue who is the true scotsman

many people have played with language

and once one group does, the rest must, to compete!

All concepts we have are those of our group

and shaped by the language itself

Good for Chinese and Good for Indian are two different things

which is specific to the group

Depends on the needs of the group, and hence its values

In fact, the strongest and most enduring one we have is our own personal definition, but it will mostly coincide with that of our group

The definition of one word is contingent on that of others

We define words, using other words

So if a simpler word is corrupted, the other word gets corrupted too