Message from @Pelth

Discord ID: 651176731553693747


2019-12-02 21:41:59 UTC  

background checks are already very common

2019-12-02 21:42:04 UTC  

Harvard is known to push political opinions like anyone else.

2019-12-02 21:42:16 UTC  

Also, if you actually read the damned article you linked, it doesn't prove your case.

2019-12-02 21:42:22 UTC  

1. It doesn't mention any polling data.

2019-12-02 21:42:29 UTC  

2. All that it mentions are two ballot initiatives.

2019-12-02 21:42:31 UTC  

and what are the implication of universal background checks

2019-12-02 21:42:34 UTC  

if you read your article, it didnt prove your case either

2019-12-02 21:42:35 UTC  

did they explain that in their poll

2019-12-02 21:42:36 UTC  

What the article fails to tell you is that roughly half of all people don't vote.

2019-12-02 21:42:37 UTC  

of course not

2019-12-02 21:42:43 UTC  

it even said that the polls could be skewered

2019-12-02 21:42:48 UTC  

because a universal background check could also apply to private gun sales

2019-12-02 21:42:54 UTC  

which nobody supports

2019-12-02 21:42:56 UTC  

So obviously, if only old people are voting, then clearly, yes, the right wing nut job position is the one most likely to pass.

2019-12-02 21:43:03 UTC  

Because old people are disproportionately right wing nut jobs.

2019-12-02 21:43:26 UTC  

An electoral result is not a reliable indicator of public opinion.

2019-12-02 21:43:32 UTC  

because the left wing vouches for pedophilia, who wouldnt be right wing at this point? :c

2019-12-02 21:43:36 UTC  

good, how about a civil war libtard

2019-12-02 21:43:46 UTC  

The only way it would be a reliable indicator of public opinion would be if we had mandatory, universal voting.

2019-12-02 21:43:48 UTC  

Which we don't have.

2019-12-02 21:43:51 UTC  

the best measure of public support

2019-12-02 21:43:56 UTC  

is open conflict

2019-12-02 21:44:21 UTC  

yeah but to say background checks are widely accepted is just as retarded though

2019-12-02 21:44:31 UTC  

Then show me polling data which goes against it.

2019-12-02 21:44:36 UTC  

You didn't show me polling data.

2019-12-02 21:44:49 UTC  

nobody would poll that unless they were trying to achieve a political objective

2019-12-02 21:44:51 UTC  

Even your NRA propaganda source didn't have polling data.

2019-12-02 21:44:56 UTC  

nobody is going to pay the money

2019-12-02 21:45:09 UTC  

YOU MEAN LIKE THE NRA?

2019-12-02 21:45:17 UTC  

it's expensive to run these polls so anti gun lobbyists are footing the bill

2019-12-02 21:45:20 UTC  

YOU DON'T THINK THAT THE NRA WOULD GLADLY DO POLLS IF THEY THOUGHT THE PUBLIC AGREED WITH THEM?

2019-12-02 21:45:31 UTC  

THEY'D BE POLLING LEFT AND RIGHT.

2019-12-02 21:45:39 UTC  

now if those researchers did not achieve the results the lobbyists were looking for, they wouldn't get hired again

2019-12-02 21:45:44 UTC  

it's really as simple as that

2019-12-02 21:45:44 UTC  

Yeah.

2019-12-02 21:45:45 UTC  

sounds like communist propaganda to me but okay

2019-12-02 21:45:48 UTC  

Because the NRA totally doesn't lobby.

2019-12-02 21:45:49 UTC  

Ever.

2019-12-02 21:45:52 UTC  

I know all about the research field

2019-12-02 21:45:53 UTC  

Fucking retards.

2019-12-02 21:45:54 UTC  

All of you.