I think what he meant was US gun laws reduce crime in Europe. The American gun nuts are the ones that funded the demilling of surplus firearms from European armies that no longer exist

Lmao

I don't see how that follows. Something about import bans or something? Please educate me sir.

What kind of mental hoops you gotta jump through for that

The East German Army had thousands of AKs, Century Arms and others went there, bought the complete firearms, hired a work force to take them apart, toss full auto parts in one bin and bag up the others to send to the US to make Semi-Auto Only firearms. It happened in Germany, Hunguary, Poland, and countless other former com-block countries and some NATO countries used it to ditch surplus firearms without them getting loose and into the hands of crooks

Oh so yeah, the import ban and full auto NFA shit? Fucking fuck. I hate the NFA

Agree, but that is how the US Gun Nut keeps the world a safer place over seas.

Well, if we could just straight up buy the full auto ones that would do the same thing

So you can slap that tidbit at a Gungrabber

How would that help? That would say to them "Look, Europe is safer cause no more guns!"

Point out that the 3:15 to Paris "Machine Gun" was seized and destroyed by the UN in 2002 . By banning and confiscating firearms, they made Europe less safe.

What is that? Google tells me that there's a Clint Eastwood movie about a gun fight on a Train vs terrorists

Islamic Jihasist tried to take over a train with military Pattern AKs and got the shit kicked out of them by US service members (Air Force and Army National Guard). The Jihadists used firearms that were seized by UN forces in the balkans and "Was destroyed!" but later turned up on the train intact and un damaged.

Hmm. The UN took all the guns from the militaries and citizens of com-block countries and they ended up out of legal ownership, and into terrorist hands? Sounds like a great time.

Well thankfully, the US got most of them, the UN took them from waring parties in the Balkans and outside of Europe... and... they are showing back up in new conflict zones.

Wow, that's actually a crazy proof of the whole "Take guns away from law abiding people and they end up only in criminal hands" thing.

We also prevent crime in eastern europe in the early 1990s by giving people jobs breaking down "Machine Guns" for import as legal firearms to be rebuilt in the US

Governments like to sell guns to terrorists apparently

**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKvsoBGBA5Q

Yeah it's bs how all the FA receivers for milsurp these days have to be destroyed to import them to the us

The hughes amendment is a load of shit

so if some of the idiots here are convinced that due to banning guns in europe we have acid attacks and knife attacks (of which the first are extremely and i mean extremely uncommon uncommon) we have seen a spike in violence since mass immigration but before that europe was one of the most peacefull places in the world

if you think that a society where you NEED guns is a good society, you are majorly disconnected from the real world

attacks with acid and pipebombs or rampage stabbings have been all over the media and this makes people lose their shit because if their is anyone better at spreading terror then simple terrorsits its the common media

I'm from the UK and I don't think you know why having an armed population is a good thing.

i dont think you understand what i said

Some idiots do say that but I still think that you can have an armed populars and still be peaceful.. Having no guns does not make you peaceful.

no but it has shown to go alongside with reducing crime reducing murder, something you should know seeing as before brittain went to shit with gangs and no go zones bobby's didnt even carry guns as a simple stick was more then enough sadly nowadays people are eager to blame all the violence in europe on us having a very close to unarmed population because they are desperate for examples to show that we need guns, which in a well running society are never necesarry as in a well running society there is almost never the need to defend your life, the only use guns should have in a society is recreation or probably hunting

and i dont give a shit if you need 2 m249's 5 saiga's and a lau 130 to achieve your absolute recreation

just dont try to tell me that if you live in a place where defending yourself with force is needed means you live in a well functioning society

Yes, the ability to defend yourself is a sign of a non functioning society. Thank you for that sage European perspective. I guess this is why they pay you the big bucks.

when did i say ability?

im talking about needs

abilities are useless if they dont satisfy your needs

Defending yourself is inherently forceful. Wagging your finger at a burglar doesn't work as much as you pansy Eurotrash kids think.

you clearly dont understand what im going at

having a gun will never solve any of the problems you currently have in a brittain

Yeah but it helps. You can't shoot all the migrants yourself

well then what is stopping you those migrants get guns so its not that hard to get one

you have atleast a bit of cash and they have guns

easy solution