It's been "common sense" for like 20 years now

If it was common sense, then why wasn't it done during the first "common sense" legislation?

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." That means the people should have the TO&E for an individual Light Infantry trooper.

"well regulated"
it says well regulated so you have no right to keep and bear arms whatsoever, the militia is the government /s

Well regulated just means "well prepared"

IN military terms "Well Regulated" now means "Complete load out of Table of Orginazation and Equipment" (TO&E)

So I should have like

Plates and helm

and a full-auto capable rifle

Which seems pretty standard

with a 14.5 inch barrel no less

Everybody should be allowed to an an M4

back when the nfa was being challenged in court it was argued that short barreled shotguns were not in military use so the nfa was constitutional

now NFA items are used by the military all the time

Literally the Mk18 and short-barreled M870s are perfect examples

about 75% of the Swiss military is Militia Regiments, every member has their complete kit including their STG in their home.

A TO&E for a militia member should include a Moderine intermediate carbine (AR-15/ AKpattern or simular) web gear to carry at least 6 magazines, and a stock of ammo for the magazines

Right.

This solves the "but should every citizen be allowed to own nukes??" problem

ie. You can argue a reasonable limit

the most insane part of the NFA has to be the shot barreled rifles/shotguns part especially considering you can have handguns just fine
a long barrel is not required for many guns, for home defense(one of the biggest points of the 2nd amendment right now) a shorter barrel is ideal

iirc the NFA was originally going to have pistols too, the goal was to make any easy to conceal weapons hard to get

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Femptormaven.com%2Fimg%2FPistol_v_SBR-300.jpg&f=1

and then you're allowed to just ignore the NFA when it comes to stuff like the c96 with a stock or the tankgewehr(destructive device)

Also

People bring full-sized ARs into classrooms to fire at people width

People don't need it to be shorter in order to hurt people

The idea is that a "Handgun" as per the NFA is meant to be a one handed firearm for use in close for protection, a legitimate use. Things like the C96 where you stuck a stock on them meant they became Pistol Caliber Carbines... but all the oldies like the C96 are on the Except roster

Didn't the vegas dude use 20" barrel ARs?

Literally find me the incident where people used SBRs

i'm sure non sbrs are used for mass shootings because they're easier to buy, you could chop off the barrel but there's no real advantage to be had for doing that

plus there's the gas system and threaded barrel to worry about

The only SBRs used in crimes have been unregistered use by criminals who chopjobed them by themselves

or put a stock on a "pistol" probably

Not even that @Grovyle

All the stock kicks for hand guns now a days have "This is an NFA Item" on the box

Gross

I mean those braces are great

and should actually be a good example of "stocks" not being an issue

I use a cane and the PDW Pistol Brace is useful to me to get more control for using the firearm as a pistol while I use the cane in the other hand

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fbkingsfirearms.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F05%2FSB_A3_Solo_Tube_Right_5714EDITFLAT-web1.jpg&f=1