Message from @Arch-Fiend

Discord ID: 420049623021781003


2018-03-05 02:42:18 UTC  

which would mean it defines nothing

2018-03-05 02:42:24 UTC  

boats don't have any

2018-03-05 02:42:29 UTC  

which is why i dont like the word

2018-03-05 02:42:44 UTC  

boats are called she

2018-03-05 02:42:49 UTC  

do something about it

2018-03-05 02:43:22 UTC  

btw, afaik boat is male in spanish

2018-03-05 02:43:25 UTC  

barco

2018-03-05 02:43:36 UTC  

thats fine, now its male

2018-03-05 02:43:39 UTC  

or bote

2018-03-05 02:43:48 UTC  

la lancha is female

2018-03-05 02:44:06 UTC  

doesent make gender any more useful a way to define sex

2018-03-05 02:44:17 UTC  

now that inanimate objects have genders

2018-03-05 02:44:20 UTC  

you basically destroyed your own argument though, genders in languages are binary

2018-03-05 02:44:38 UTC  

i never said genders wernt binary

2018-03-05 02:44:42 UTC  

there's male, female and neutral

2018-03-05 02:44:43 UTC  

i said i dont care about them

2018-03-05 02:45:11 UTC  

and that it doesent define sex

2018-03-05 02:45:13 UTC  

you were arguing "gender =/= sex"

2018-03-05 02:45:38 UTC  

sex doesent define bianary, sex that we know of has a bianary

2018-03-05 02:46:39 UTC  

you lost me, idk what you meant

2018-03-05 02:47:14 UTC  

what you said before the last thing i said only makes sense with the thing you said before that if your defining bianary as sex

2018-03-05 02:47:30 UTC  

language has masculine, feminine, and neutral. If you want to call that arbitrary distinctions gender, then fine. But that is a random ass thing to call gender

2018-03-05 02:48:10 UTC  

also probably not appropriate because i believe it already has a name

2018-03-05 02:49:07 UTC  

continuing with this thread of discussion.. so should languages invent 35 new ways to gender nouns?

2018-03-05 02:49:10 UTC  

oh, it already has a name, grammatical gender, so i guess you can just call that gender

2018-03-05 02:49:19 UTC  

well, sjw's would like that

2018-03-05 02:49:29 UTC  

and good fucking luck to them, i'd like to see them try it

2018-03-05 02:49:31 UTC  

would be amusing to see them try

2018-03-05 02:49:35 UTC  

i havent called any arbitrary disstinction gender, at first i started with gender not existing, then i moved forward with the idea that if you want gender to exist then gender must define something different than sex because things without sex have gender, if you created a definition that made sense in that context for gender then gender would be social and psychological sexual characteristics

2018-03-05 02:50:04 UTC  

gender always existed as another synonim to sex

2018-03-05 02:50:09 UTC  

we didn't agree on that?

2018-03-05 02:50:17 UTC  

gender = sex, just as there are many other words that mean the same as other words

2018-03-05 02:50:28 UTC  

its a piss poor definition for sex if it doesent actually work as a definition for sex

2018-03-05 02:50:33 UTC  

you can take any existing thing that says gender and you could replace it with sex

2018-03-05 02:50:41 UTC  

as that is how it was used

2018-03-05 02:50:46 UTC  

you cant say "this word means this word but only sometimes"

2018-03-05 02:51:00 UTC  

you can say those applications of the word sex seem silly or random, and i would agree

2018-03-05 02:51:06 UTC  

that doesn't change the fact that is how it was used

2018-03-05 02:51:15 UTC  

Besides, why not?

2018-03-05 02:51:56 UTC  

there is no "but only sometimes"

2018-03-05 02:52:12 UTC  

what sex is a boat?