guys i think im a pedophobe

Why is the racial breakdown of cyclists a problem? Are they going to have to hand out cycling licenses and limit the number given to white people?

Maybe pay non-white people to cycle next to white people so cycling lanes feel more diverse?

It's like how in Canada they're complaining that the outdoors is too white.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cfp91GmHCg

@Atkins according to the article, they think its because things are not safe enough

idk what that has to do with it being mostly white, apparently only white people, specifically white males, are stupid enough to ride in such potentially dangerous conditions?

no clue

some things in life are not safe. i don't see how skin color affects that. unless white people have unbreakable skin or something.

adamantium bones

the article really does not explain how the two relate

they are just like "cycling is too white!"

"why?"
"No clue! just is! must be racism somehow"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuHmFkbuihc&feature=youtu.be

@Atkins You have to remeber race is more than skin color. Saying the only difference between the races is skin color is kind of like saying the only difference between dog breeds is their size. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L6vraY2OW8

you do realize that nobody here is reading your shit

Just rember race is more than skin color.

Race is more than just skin color, but it isn't that big of a deal bro.

I sugeest you watch the video I linked. Basically racial differences include average intelligence, bone structure, ect.

By nature we are different but by nurture we are equal.

No I get that, I'm not an sjw that denies science. But those aren't very important charactaristics of individuals. If we're working towards a societal goal its okay that some aren't as affluent or able as others. I don't see the differences we have as that bad of a thing.

That's not how evolution works. the races evolved in different environment so why would they be the same?

Its when people abuse their abilities or lack of that is the problem, which I'm sure is what sets you on fire. That's not unique.

The thing is society is made of millions of people not a few people so we need to look at the average.

I don't understand how a group of people who have an average IQ of 85 (American blacks) can live in the same society as people who have an averge IQ of 100 (whites).

Because averages are part of it. How can the whites with 130 IQ live with whites who have 70?

I'm talking about the racial averages. I know whites have a wide bell curve but whites would live better with other whites because monoracial are more successful than multiracial societies because monoracial societies there are no racial tension while multiracial societies will always have racial tension.

Give Bowling Alone a read and then tell me a diverse society is better than a homogeneous society.

Or you could read this.

I'll give it a read when I get back. And while I don't think diversity is the greatest thing in the world I don't see it as a detriment. The US is pretty successful, some would say. Compared with, say, Peru or Kyrgystan. bbl

I would say America is more successful than Peru because America had a white super majorty. I think a better question to ask is why has Canada always done better than Brazil?

Averages are nothing more than observations that tell you nothing about an individual standing in front of you.

Why are the whitest parts of Brazil better than the other parts of Brazil?

they have ancesteral heritage of money from colonization

Grenade we are dealing with millions of people we can't run a society on a individual basis.

that money gave them political position, that political position gave them the ability to make choices that influinced their childrens future before that of the rest of the nation