But lets just put it in as a test case

More test cases grouped. Most intelligent, least intelligent, and average

And mixed equally

So we get a bell curve

Outliers are a thing but for example if a environment which had very bad winters which to survive the people who live in that environment need to have a average IQ of say 90 to just get by. That would mean that if the people in that environment had a average IQ of 80 most of them wouldn't survive. There would be some outliers who would but if their aren't enough that population would die out.

So how the smartest black would perform against the dumbest asians for example

But well, you can also study societal structure from that alone

How each group will treat their smartest and dumbest

True the dumb ones would die in those types of winters.

Thats also kinda culture in its own

At first id assume.

Theres also physical strengths but thats kinda very diverse.

That depends on the population

Asians arnt tough by average. And id reckon outside the millitary whites arnt either.

I know obesity is to blame

And that not all are weak

Ignore extremes here as well, we want the average healthy person with no blemishes

That includes being of "optimal" weight

Some groups tend to be nearer to the average while others have a greater cluster. And that is also compared to males and females for example White males tend to have more geniuses but alot more retards while female whites tend to be nearer to the average.

Compared to blacks both Whites and Asians aren't very tough on average.

Isnt that true for all races though?

That women are generally more consistant?

Cause if one men is defective, thats just one gene gone. But a woman being defective is disastrous since thats alot of potential decendants gone

I think so. I know Asians tend to be more consistant compared to whites.

Though thats also due to less dynamic environment Id argue

Its alot of different terrain types there.

But I dont think they change very much over the seasons.

As I said earlier I'm just a layman so I don't know for sure.

Ah just offering my point.

I would imagine that would play a part.

Theres also another factor, resource availability

We have the japs that got on with very little metal and the euros that got on with well, enough of it

So how hard it will be to gather food.

Pleantyful with no seasons would be like africa or south america?

Pleantyful with seasons is like europe.

True have less resources available would create alot more pressures.

Or just change the focus

Like alot of resources can mean two things

They dont bother with innovation, or they have more time to innovate.

With that I would point out that Africa is very resource rich which would make it a easier place to live. Which is why I think that blacks evolved the way they did. They just had a easier environment which prevented selection of genes for intelligence and prevented innovation.

Hell, id say the same for the mid east before the sahara started eating everything