initiate protocol 1776

lemme find it real quick

but tldr

they tried to introduce a new law

where criticism that involves threats was illegal

but heres the thing

they made it so vague

ANYTHING could be a threat

laws like that don't hold up in court

there is a void for vagueness doctrine

and it makes the law unconstitutional

yea but the fact is they tried

GG @luke5135, you just advanced to level 7!

....

gonna get cucked by virginia dems

like why

why would they try to even do that

https://media.tenor.com/images/df4268738930ad28dfb6082b5d425587/tenor.gif

cause they want you to bed over for them

like virginia dems are going to start the second civil war

bend*

but it wont even be a war

i remember everyone was saying that about oregon

we'd see the dems over there be publicly executed by the militia

I lost the game.

where the oregon republicans fled the state over some shitty climate change law, and the dems were going to send the state troopers after them, so the militias and county police formed around them with guns and told the dems to fuck off

like they all marched the capitol armed... if they wanted the security could not have held them back they could've marched in and killed them and nobody would've said who did it .

yeah but they were queers and obeyed the rules. so.

I honestly think it's time we start doing this to unconstitutional parts of the government

the dems would just use it as fuel

it wouldn't help

Dog.

if there was any left

this would start the civil war

not over that

dude with how tense things are

yeah but at what point is when we start saying "fuel or not, you're not taking my rights" ?

because something like that would make the militia the clear aggressor

at this point

a slight fart could start a war

if they sent the police or national guard to try and take guns