It makes it harder for a mass shooting to happen...
statstically in areas where banning large capacity magazines they've had similar rates to ares without those bans
so it does nothing
similar rates of what?
similar rates of mass shootings, and deaths in those shootings
Lol are there rates for mass shootings?
is it that bad?
not really
theres no exact statistics
Then how can you say > so it does nothing
but the estimates suggest it doesn't have anything to do with magazines and on the other hand actually suggest it more involves the lack of firearm safety taken by families that own firearms
Most mass shooters use pistols anyway
and yes most mass shootings are actually done with pistols, but those are widely not reported on
But having the capability to fire away 20 bullets...
stresbal lets look at history a gun that had a five round internal magazine the sks
someone with training could easily fire 20 rounds out of that with practice and knowledge on reloading fast
oh the sks <:blobthumbsup:578020965011816519>
infact i've done that
I know it from games
I actually limit my round count to five rounds per magazine so I don't waste ammo
someone who intends on doing a mass shooting can just as easily kill 20 people with a 5 round magazine or a 30 round magazine
so this isn't a problem with magazines
hold on i'll get a picture of my old sks
my ar15 top, my sks prior to selling it bottom
also that shows the difference between 5.56 and 7.62
that sks could be reloaded with clips or magazines
a clip can be easily made
to hold around 10 rounds
sks's are also considerably cheaper than the average ar 15
and just so you know
both magazines hold a maximum capacity of 30 rounds
there is a big difference between 5.56 and 7.62 in size
Having to reload your mag still gives people time to react
everything helps
no really
a magazine reload takes less than half a second
Damn you got an sks
thats pretty damn cool
I HAD
I sold it
