lel

CNN would be interviewing hookers on the streets carrying around literal suitcases full of 100 dollar bills. New strip clubs would open on every street corner.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/407984648266711078/505208151315054593/unknown.png

dont get too confident tho, women actually do this all the time just not in a organized fashion typically.

but this is just more BS

Um was that meant to go before the image I posted?

eh doesnt matter its just yet another BS article

kawasaki analysis

Kawasaki

BTW Sushi is astoundingly easy to make if you've got the materials.

To necro an old topic...

I dont get how one can get so convicted in behaving in that way which you despise so deeply.
I just dont understand how you can avoid that mirror, just a tiny fraction of questioning yourself would shatter this ridiculously bloated attitude atm

I got in a YouTube comment argument recently with some guy saying you can't make allies on the left...

Shit be wack, yo.

you can, just not with the ones im describing

tim falls in that category

oh right i forgot, hes labeled as a rightwing nazi these days, my bad

That didn't work too well....

Well you cant stop a society from progressing

thats an argument u will never win

but the fact of the matter is, today society is not progressing

but REgressing

back towards the really really bad old days

If progress occurs around universal principle, it's hard to argue against.

it just happens naturally, ofc its helped by good arguments, id say martin luther king was a prime example of that in recent years

but these morons dont present arguments because they have none, all they have is browbeating people into agreeing with their regressive censorious bullshit

Mlk was principled

He had a properly constructed argument

coming from a principle sure

But in order to convince people u need arguments.
I can sit here all day fawning over my principles, its not gonna convince anyone that what i say has any value

I mean, what do you think a proper argument is?

I believe in universal rule. If your rules apply to everyone, including the rule maker, then they can be fair.

It's what makes the left off balance

They're creating rules they don't have to follow.

If your rules selectively protect or restrict someone based on immutable characteristics, religion, politics, or philosophy, you need to rethink it, because you would consider it unfair for those to be used against you.

But enough seriousposting here.

You dudes, what do you think of my FIRE(!) mix?