wut

"a community of people composed of one or more nationalities and possessing a more or less defined territory and government"

" territorial division containing a body of people of one or more nationalities and usually characterized by relatively large size and independent status"

"a politically organized nationality"

oy vey who wrote that definition

See

They dont care

Its all baiting

@.B wait i derailed it?

hey this is a serious question DM me if you are interested . I need someone who wants to play Neverwinter my party needs a healer and i will carry you to max level and pay for your gear i just need a player that can cater to a pally and a rogue

i also started it but yeah...

there will never be a productive discussion if people don't agree on definitions. This is why the left tries to control definitions and goes with "everything is a spectrum"

as you try and redefine words and phrases

if you think all 3 are the same, why would you even use the 3 interchangeably?

Because they are not. They are related, even subsets at times. but not the same

never said they are

all three mean different things.

Hell, a white supremacy could hate nations. be an anarchist and just want very other race gone

Nationalist is a thing, use it. Ethnostate is a thing, use it. Supremacy is a thing, use it

what do you call people who want an ethnostate for whites?

white supremacist

why?

that's just plain wrong

does that name not mean a believe white people are superior?

unless thinking whites are *superior* is their stated reason for wanting the ethnostate

I certainly wouldn't say "White Nationalist"

White Supremacist is the closest one

would you ever use white nationalist?

like I said, I wouldn't

So your saying productive conversation is us accepting your term of definition without a source but we are interperating it incotrectly ?

it's "white nation"alist

think of it that way

so you are not even arguing against its definition, you are arguing against it even being a word

@Walsp are you talking to me or to them?

and you cant have nation by the definition with out race.

but are they really supremacists if they willingly admit - by their own arguments, they are inferior to asians?

@Grenade123 I was pretty clear above

let me quote

@Jasse except there is an or there, which means any of those traits equals a nation

but good understanding of english

Jasse, history/culture/language are more than enough