> "With that reasoning all laws are modernist"
It's mostly me being sardonic, but I don't affirm Natural Law theory anyways. If you seriously believe that natural rights are modernist, existentialist atheism is the most reactionary position you can hold.

> God can take that away at any time for any reason.
1) God is omnibenevolent.
2) To be omnibenevolent is to always do good.
C1) God can only do good.
4) God can take away contingent (privileged) existence.
C2) God can only take away contingent (privileged) existence for good reason.
5) Natural Law is that which is good.
C3) God takes away contingent (privileged) existence based on Natural Law.

@Vulpes I think this is enough

https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3932472.html

According to the American edition of "DefenseNews" in the material "Pentagon seeks to cut F-35s , other equipment to pay for Trump's border wall", the US Department of Defense plans to redirect $ 3.8 billion - mainly because of its budget for the purchase of arms and military equipment 2020 fiscal year, to finance the construction of the border wall on the Mexican border at the initiative of US President Donald Trump, according to a request for reallocation of funds received by the US Congress.

Sinn Fein is going to takeover ireland

Fuck the establishment

Yeah would be so great to have a left wing nationalist party in charge which would be nationalist because it doesn't like Britain but still would let the native population be replaced

Ireland is fucked

Unfortunate

Potatoes

@Mr. Nessel we should just close out borders altogether in europe

That will solve the problem

I'd love if Schengen properly enforced its own borders rather than passing on the burden to Greece/Italy/Spain and having Germany bribe Turkey not to open the floodgates

AfD guy (Gauland): "Hanau shooter was **clearly insane**, he mentioned something about "grooming gangs" and "America".

what

idiots everwhere

Massive fag and hypocrite that guy

Also tried to call others out for instrumentalising the attack to go after the AfD for political gain, when the AfD has done the same thing with islamic attacks

https://t.co/U8dkWF4z0M

Based Vaush

@McFansy, @Shekel Stealer or anyone else. Do you remember Barbra Spectre and her infamous speech to the Sweeds explaining how Jews were going to lead Europe into a multi-cultural mode? She said Europe would not survive if they do not. Do you have any insight into the theory of what she was talking about relating to survival? It's easy to dismiss as a disingenuous trick but if I was to assume it was a good-faith argument, in thier mind, what survival is at risk? What does a multi-cultural mode solve relating to survival?

Either it's meant in the "we need migrants prop up pensions ponzi schemes in a shrinking society" sense or Macron's view

Macron would like the EU to remove itself from Nato and become the main neoliberal force on the planet, which is why he also likes the idea of extending the common market to Africa

In the head of someone like him population=power

Though I think that jewish woman isn't that much concerned abotu the survival of Europe. It's vacuous rhetoric more than anything

@MicMac If you want to understand the mindset of the eternal rootless cosmopolitan watch Academic Agent's video on "The World View of Leon Wieseltier".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI7EA8M95ro

@MicMac If I was being generous, I would say she is talking about economic and population collapse, as Nesselblatt said. This is also assuming a lot of things. That immigrants are economically beneficial, that white fertility rates can't be raised etc. But obviously multi-culturalism is advantageous for Jews so she has a strong motive to say stuff like that.

Yeah, the motivation is transparent. I was curious if there was actually anything substantial to an argument.

I could float an unorthodox theory.

In an era of bioengineered weapons having a greater pool of genetic diversity would be an advantage, or by inverse deadly.

The same goes for the complexity in designing a bioweapon.

Monocrops

Yeah, I know what you mean. The argument for biodiversity in food crops is very similar to this. I'm not sure whether it would be applicable to humans however, just considering how much biodiversity already exists within races. It's an interesting point though, and maybe something worth looking into.

That's the best argument I've been able to rationalize for a good-intentioned reason that elites would be going this direction.

Eventually though, if they got their way, all racial biodiversity would be eradicated and we would all become a single monorace. So maybe it wouldn't matter in the long run.

It could be that they genuinely believe the shit they teach our kids. I sometimes think they really have drank their own cool aid.

Most of them truly believe their own bullshit. "All men were created equal" which even biblically is not true. Try telling them that the Canaanites were the same as the Israelites. God commanded that his chosen people exterminate another race of people. How does that even remotely line up with what we are being taught today?

Might explain why the browbeat Chistians with equality while simultaneously hating and shitting on Christianity

They require the veneer of Christianity without any of the morality. Like someone wearing the skin of another person pretending to be that person. Why do Christian leaders put up with it?

Simple, they are losing numbers within there parishs.