Lol

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 Have you taken PolitiScales before?

Yeah a while ago

Fatherland work family

Yeah, I’m Work Fatherland Ecology

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 I just got my 9Axes results

Cool

I know I at first had trouble with these types of tests because how I would want things run are different from when my preferred ideologies are in charge or not in charge

>216 questions

It also asks like the same questions 5 times

eh

It conflates social liberalism with a like for technology

So apart from that axis it seems relatively accurate for me

where is the lie tho?

Technology has a liberal bias

now Hamhock is doing a weekly anti-hate podcast

with this guy, it's first time as farce, then as farce again

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-tuesday/constitution-originalist-jurisprudence-adrian-vermeule/

the absolute state of american "conservatism"

all of it written in complete seriousness

<:honk:594728750265008128>

I don't see anything wrong with what he wrote, not in the paragraphs I read.

```But the less-exotic silliness is more immediately relevant. That silliness has a familiar source: It is the fact that specialists reliably overestimate the importance of their own fields. Lawyers believe that the way to reform the world is to change the law; it was a poet who thoughts poets “the unacknowledged legislators of the world”; the self-aggrandizing character of journalists is well-known; scientists often take a utopian view of science and erroneously believe that science can supplant politics, relieving us of the burden of disagreement; members of Congress, who spend their time sitting on committees, reflexively propose to solve problems by convening a new committee.```
This in particular is a good way to put it.

muh liberalism

Yes.

But do you have an argument to accompany that opinion?

lol do you know where you are

he's criticizing us

Sounds more like he's criticizing you. I'm one if the libertarians you invited over to enrich your gene pool

>unironic libertarians

<:PeepoWeird:684862716430647319>

being libertarian in year of our lord 2020 A.D. 😂

https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/whose-common-good/

Vermuele: `I want to suggest a principle of immigration priority that should, I hope, be broadly acceptable or at least intriguing for all right-thinking persons concerned that current American immigration policy is racist and classist, explicitly or implicitly, de jure or de facto. The principle is to give lexical priority to confirmed Catholics, all of whom will jump immediately to the head of the queue. Yes, some will convert in order to gain admission; this is a feature, not a bug.

This principle will disproportionately favor immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Latin America. (Note here that the priority is for actual Catholics, not for applicants from “historically Catholic countries”; relatively few Western Europeans will pass through the eye of the needle, and the Irish will be almost totally excluded). It will disproportionately favor the poor, and will draw no distinction between those seeking asylum based on a fear of persecution, and those fleeing “mere” economic hardship. It will in effect require opening the southern border of the United States, although immigration from Canada will rightly become a rare and difficult event, at least if we do not count a small subset of Quebecois.`