Message from @rybus
Discord ID: 690249503454134298
Wittgenstein wasn't even that bad
they still all wank over him so he is in that respect
@Pseudo-Analysist look who it is
Analytic philosophy can really range from really bad to actually kind of useful
So I read some of the Quran. There are truly drastic differences from Christianity and Islam.
Christianity preaches of a loving merciful God.
Islam preaches of a stringent merciless Allah.
more at 11
>Islam is a religion of evil
Jews: Am I a joke to you
IDK if I’d call it evil, because we’re kinda thinking like progressives judging it through that lens, but incompatible with Christianity, yes.
Subjective, a Muslim wouldn’t believe that, but it’s definitely incompatible with Christianity. The two don’t go together well.
Anthony says it's evil because if it became dominant he'd never be allowed to watch Aniki gachimuchis legally
didn't you praise islamic terror attacks as part of an incel uprising
you say it like it's a good thing
Islam is incompatible with Christianity not only on the level of theistic interpretation of God but also on a fact that modern christians are pretty much pagans for them (not that they are necessarily wrong in this regard considering how many leftovers of paganism are in modern Christian Europe).
I wouldn't even say that Christians are pagans from a muslim point of view.
We simply view eachother as different sects that reject an authority.
We reject Muhammed, they reject the divinity (although they revere) of Christ.
Do they actually revere him? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Muslim even talk about Jesus
They do, they call him a "Prophect". They reject the notion of him being divine.
I've asked many Muslims about this.
They understand him as the savior of the Jews, knowing that the jews rejected him.
Unfortunately, what they do is make up things he said in the Hadith.
They reject the OT and NT ofc, both would destroy the Quran if actually read.
^
```"“[Muhammad] seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom... Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.”```
Islam is a direct copy of Judism and Christanity.
This is Aquinas' take on Islam.
^
```Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him any witness```
This is from the nitpicking moslems like to do of the OT proclaiming that Mohammed was the messiah to be
Ofc, none of that holds weight when you look at Jesus vs. Muhammed.
There's a clear winner and fulfiller there
Nowadays, ofc, moslems have access to the Bible online if their governments havent blocked the sites
These are the nitpickers i am referring to
Even then the leaders understood the Bible's weight, and so they banned it from being read
Mhm, when Islam took off during the time between Abu Bakrs acendeance they took Syria and started to burn Scared chirstan texts.
Under the notion that "Kafirs had to be rooted out in both soul and mind".
Any reilgion that had texts dissqualfing islam in theolgy were to be rooted out and destroyed by the will of the Sword.
Islam is a militaristic religion.
We know this.